Free Speech Union Weekly News Round-Up

I’m a member of the Free Speech Union (FSU) and urge others to join too. They’re doing some excellent work. Their latest news round-up:

Dear Mike Buchanan,

Welcome to the Free Speech Union’s weekly newsletter. This newsletter is a brief round-up of the free speech news of the week sent to our members.

The Value of Life

Lord Sumption, former Supreme Court Judge, has faced criticism for articulating his view that “the older you are, the less the value of your life because there’s less of it left.” When challenged by a woman with stage four cancer on BBC’s The Big Questions, who accused Sumption of claiming her life was not valuable, Sumption interrupted: “I didn’t say it wasn’t valuable, I said it was less valuable.” Some commentators came to his defence, and Sumption himself clarified on Good Morning Britain that he was making a point about the value placed on lives by health economists and policymakers, not expressing a judgement about a person’s intrinsic value. He said: “It doesn’t mean that people are morally worth less, it doesn’t mean that they are worth less in the eyes of God or in the eyes of their fellow citizens.”

Spiked editor Brendan O’Neill argues that the persecution of lockdown sceptics has become a new form a demonology. As in past times of plague, which saw any who expressed unorthodox opinions accused of being “agents of the kingdom of evil”, today’s “lockdown fanatics” seem to think that, as bad as Covid might be, “the plague of heresy is greater.” But, O’Neill concludes, “the destruction of free discussion harms society far more than incorrect opinion or predictions do, because it limits the space for critical interrogation of public policy and for entertaining the possibility that what we are doing is wrong.”

Free speech on campus

Twenty-one Conservative MPs signed a letter to Boris Johnson asking him to reform public funding for Students Unions, which, according to the MPs, are at the “forefront of efforts to limit freedom of speech variously by censoring poetry and publications, barring speakers or insisting on approving their speeches in advance.” In a parallel move, MP David Davis called for the government to bring forward a bill to protect free speech on university campuses, pointing out that great scientific advances come from challenging orthodoxy: “The cancel culture, the unwillingness to hear uncomfortable opinions, the refusal of platforms to people you disagree with, puts all this at risk. Universities, of all places, should never allow the suppression of free speech.” He gave a ten-minute speech in the House of Commons which can be watched in full on YouTube.

Sir Michael Barber, outgoing Chairman of the Office for Students, had some strong words for university vice chancellors, cautioning them against “the pitfalls of rigid intellectual orthodoxy, groupthink and ‘won’t fit in here’ mindsets. If universities come to be seen as intellectually intolerant hot houses for mono-perspectives, they will not thrive, nor represent society.”

The right to offend

UnHerd this week published several excellent pieces related to free speech. French journalist Agnes Poirer explored the continuing fear among French teachers following the beheading of Samuel Paty in October; trans writer Debbie Hayton defended Abigail Schreier’s book Irreversible Damage, after the Trans Writers’ Union denounced a favourable review of the book in the Irish Independent as “harmful to transgender people”; and Andrew Doyle defended obscenity. Editor Freddie Sayers also interviewed FSU member Will Knowland, who stands by his decision not to remove the YouTube video of the lesson he was forbidden to teach his students – a decision that ultimately got him sacked from Eton.

North America

New York University Professor and FSU member Mark Crispin Miller is bringing a defamation lawsuit against 19 of his colleagues who wrote a letter calling on the University to conduct an expedited review of his conduct, with the aim of removing his academic freedom. They accuse him of “intimidation tactics, abuses of authority, aggressions and microaggressions, and explicit hate speech”, with particular reference to his suggestion that students look at the science behind mask mandates. Prof Miller discussed his ordeal in a podcast this week. A petition in support of Prof Miller’s right to academic freedom, which we have already circulated once to FSU members, has reached nearly 30,000 signature, and donations to his legal fund can be made here. In his own words: “This is not just about me. We’re living in a moment when academic freedom and free speech are at grave risk.”

The Eyeopener, a student newspaper at Ryerson University in Toronto, has ignored the deadline of 14 January to respond to the human rights complaint made by FSU member Jonathan Bradley. Bradley, a journalism student, was sacked from the newspaper after a former classmate shared screenshots of tweets in which he expressed his Catholic beliefs. The editor told Bradley that the LGBT community “would no longer feel safe if you are associated with the publication.”

Parler rises

After being barred from Amazon Web Services, Parler has found a new home with Epik, a web hosting company that also hosts rivel platform Gab, and video hosting site Bitchute. Meanwhile, Twitter has been accused of a double standard for banning President Trump from its platform, while allowing the Ayatollah Khamenei to continue tweeting.

Tesla founder Elon Musk, who last week called Big Tech the “de facto arbiter of free speech”, endorsed the suggestion that Big Tech “has to make the distinction between banning hate speech and banning speech it hates.” Historian Niall Ferguson argued in the Spectator that the excessive power now wielded by FATGA (Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, Google and Apple) in the public square was inevitable and said that what’s needed is “some kind of First Amendment for the internet.”

Joe Biden inaugurated

Joe Biden made his first speech as President of the United States, calling for tolerance and humility, but as the Chicago Tribune pointed out, the speech was as notable for what it lacked: “A full-throated commitment to defending the core values of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, which include the right of all Americans to speak their minds without fear of retribution.”

Kind regards,

Andrew Mahon


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Woody Allen’s innocence – how mud sticks to falsely accused men

Interesting (video, 53:28).


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Bettina Arndt: Violent women are mad but violent men are bad

Just received:

Our captured media really showed their bias in the reporting on the tragedy at Tullamarine, in Melbourne where the bodies of a mother and three children were discovered last Thursday. The ABC led the charge, with their thinly veiled account which highlighted the fact that the father of the children was “assisting police with inquiries”. Using the classic journalist’s fake nod to fair reporting, the story mentioned that there was no history of family violence but then featured prominently a list of family violence support services bang in the middle of the article.

All the media stories waxed lyrical about this caring, protective mother who adored her children, and wasted few words on the devastated father who had called the police to report the tragedy. One report in The Australian suggested the father had been led away in handcuffs by police, which wasn’t true. He was apparently never really a suspect and certainly was not charged.

By the next day, police had released their conclusion that this was a murder/suicide perpetrated by the mother. Boy, did that take the wind out of the sails of these prejudiced reporters. Within two days the story was forgotten with only the occasional piece appearing, often featuring heart-wrenching letters written by schoolfriends of the little children. No one seems to want to write about this devoted father who has seen his entire family wiped out. No investigatory reporting on how and why this happened.

Now that we know the mother was the perpetrator, how come we see absolutely no reporting about exactly how these poor children were killed? If the father had been responsible, the media would have delighted in exposing grisly details of why crime scene cleaners were required at the house.

Naturally, most of the media isn’t interested in highlighting the fact that women are just as likely as men to commit filicide, killing their own children. Currently mothers are actually more likely to do so than fathers in Australia. But have a look at this telling piece from Denise Buiten, a sociology and social justice lecturer from Notre Dame – “Men and women kill their children in roughly equal numbers and we need to understand why.”

The answer is pretty simple, according to Buiten. When it comes to perpetrators of filicide, the women are mad and the men bad.

It’s all part of our biased justice system where the gender of the perpetrator influences the outcome from the moment a crime is reported.

Hurrah for Mark Latham

Now, here’s some positive news for a change. Mark Latham has achieved a real breakthrough in his role heading up an inquiry into Higher Education for the NSW Parliament. The inquiry’s final report, tabled today, includes Recommendation 36 which seeks to abolish the kangaroo courts in NSW universities.

Here’s what it actually says:

That the NSW Government ensure the rule of law and the processes of the NSW criminal justice system are respected by universities in dealing with alleged sexual offences. Universities must use the NSW Police as their first and most important point of reference in dealing with any allegation of the law being broken, in all instances, for all allegations. In particular, NSW universities must respect the presumption of innocence and not create their own ‘Kangaroo Court’ and tribunal processes that circumvent the rules and standards of natural justice established at law by the NSW Parliament. The NSW Government should establish a legal protocol for universities to follow in this regard and, if universities chose to ignore or breach it, the protocol should be legislated as mandatory for NSW universities.

This is the first time an Australian government has been asked to take action on the appalling system for adjudicating sexual assault in our universities, which usurps criminal law and denies accused students their legal rights.

That’s pretty exciting and it was good to see the submission from our Campus Justice group featuring prominently in the report. (See p80 – 81, 6.47- 6.49)

Next step is the report will be considered by Cabinet – which is where you come in. We must get a heap of letters into Cabinet Ministers to give them the backbone to follow this through. See here – a draft letter you can use to urge each Cabinet Minister to ensure action on this issue, plus email addresses of the ones we want to lobby.

So that’s your first task for 2021 – just a few minutes of your time to make sure we tip the balance on this critical issue. After the End Rape on Campus activists’ efforts to destroy me last year, I’m even more determined not to let these wicked witches win. But I need your help.

Coercive control inquiry closing next week

Mark Latham has put out a plea for more submissions to the NSW Coercive Control inquiry – the deadline is Jan 29 so that is coming up very soon. The feminists are swamping the inquiry with letters/submissions urging this to be added to the armory women can use to destroy the men in their lives. And they are out in force massaging public opinion to show women are never really perpetrators.

Look at this research by Melbourne University academics suggesting women never use force without having good reason – like a controlling husband. “There is only so much a person can take. Everyone has a breaking point,” they quote one woman who ended up in a violence program after breaking a window. She admitted she was intoxicated, “using alcohol to help with the fear and anxiety.” We won’t tolerate excuses for violence from men but with women it is different, of course.

I’ve been looking at some fascinating statistics from the UK. There were 24,845 coercive control incidents recorded in England and Wales in the year ending March 2020. But that resulted in only 305 convictions, 301 men and 4 women. That ratio is hardly a surprise. The coercive control legislation is supposed to be gender-neutral but most men are reluctant to see themselves as victims and know if they complain they are unlikely to be taken seriously by police and the legal system.

So here we have this flood of complaints chewing up valuable police time but most come to nothing due to either women withdrawing their complaints or difficulty providing evidence for nebulous crimes like economic abuse, “invasive surveillance”, “gaslighting” and “denying freedom”.

We certainly don’t need this nonsense adding a huge burden on our own stretched legal system.

That’s why I need you all to do another little job for me – and for the men of NSW. Here’s the link to make a submission and here is background information you can use to object to new legislation on coercive control. At minimum you can just write a few sentences, or a paragraph or two.

We’ve allowed so much of our legal system to be weaponized against men. Here’s a chance stop it getting any worse.

Woody Allen and the lost presumption of innocence.

Finally, here’s the video of the thinkspot chat I had with Janice Fiamengo and Diana Davison about the persecution of Woody Allen. The Woody Allen/Mia Farrow saga is just unbelievable; let alone the sorry tale of outrageous media coverage it has received. Have a listen. I think you will find it fascinating.  https://youtu.be/8JomEP29Uhg

Until next time, when I will have some big news for you.

Cheers, Tina


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

ICMI20: Mike Buchanan – “Why Women Fail to Compete Successfully With Men, and Will Always Fail”

I’ve just published this. The video description:

This video is a lightly edited version of the video originally published for ICMI20. No alcohol was consumed before or during the making of this video.

Mike Buchanan is a Men’s Rights Activist, author, publisher, and events organizer. He’s the Conference Director and chairman of the organising committee for the next ICMI, another virtual event, here.

Mike is an occasional fantasist. This video was recorded in the main library of his principal summer residence, Buchanan Castle, near Loch Lomond in Scotland.

Mike is the creator of the website Laughing at Feminists.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Will Knowland, sacked Eton teacher: I stand by my patriarchy lecture

Interesting (video, 35:35). The interviewer is a blithering idiot, and Will Knowland is a saint for having got through the interview without losing his cool.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Regarding Men Speaks with Warren Farrell

Enjoy (video, 1:12:23).


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

A tribute to William McGonagall (1825 – 1902)

Our thanks to Professor Janice Fiamengo for her learned contribution to this (video, 26:40).


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Gwyneth Paltrow’s “This smells like my vagina” candle (scent notes include geranium, citrusy bergamot, and cedar absolutes juxtaposed with Damask rose and ambrette seed) reportedly explodes in British woman’s home

Our thanks to Paolo for this. Another story for our overflowing “You couldn’t make this s*** up!” filing cabinet. I think we can all agree Gwyneth Paltrow allegedly has a particularly fragrant v****a, possibly uniquely fragrant. Classy lady.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

THE SUN: Predator Women – How deviant babysitters abusing toddlers and twisted paedophile ‘mistresses’ are fuelling the rise of female sex offenders

Our thanks to Mike P for this.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

BBC: Female child sex abuse ‘remains taboo’ while victims struggle

Our thanks to Stu for this. The start of the piece:

Victims of female child sexual abusers face “enormous stigma and shame”, according to police and charities.

Figures from BBC Radio 4’s File on 4 show there were over 10,400 reports of this type of abuse from 2015 to 2019 – equivalent to an average of 40 a week.

Experts say there is still a “lack of understanding” about the extent of such abuse.

The UK government said it would not allow “any safe space for sex offenders to operate – male or female”.

Between 2015 and 2019, the numbers of reported cases of female-perpetrated child sexual abuse to police in England and Wales rose from 1,249 to 2,297 – an increase of 84%.

Can anyone believe that the increase in reporting is a reflection of increase in perpetration? Surely not. The reason that female-perpetrated sex abuse of children (and adults, for that matter) remains a taboo and there’s a “lack of understanding” of it is that successive governments have kowtowed to feminists to make it so.

You have to scroll well down the article before coming to these lines:

Katherine Cox, services manager with male and non-binary victim support charity Survivors UK, said she believes the File on 4 figures did not reflect an increase in abuse, but an increase in people feeling able to report to the authorities.

However, she added, far too many victims “believe they won’t be believed”.

“The prosecution rates are really low for any survivor,” Ms Cox said.

“I think for a male survivor of female perpetrated abuse, the reality of getting a conviction is usually going to be extremely low.” [The two female “journalists” say nothing on why this might be the case, presumably not the case for female survivors.]…

Survivors UK have a waiting list of 10 months for its counselling services…

File on 4’s data shows the gender split between male and female victims is roughly half.

The longest section (pp. 31-7) in our 2015 general election manifesto was on sexual abuse of men and children by women. On p.31 we referenced Michele Elliot’s book Female Sexual Abuse of Children: The Ultimate Taboo (1993).


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.