Bernie Sanders tells men they need to support killing more babies

Outrageous. MRAs will, I confidently predict, become ever more active in protecting the lives of unborn children. The subject of my talk at the recent Messages 4 Men conference in London was Abortion is a men’s issue, too.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Inyoung You, 21, former Boston College student, arraigned in connection with boyfriend's suicide death

Our thanks to Steve for this. The piece ends with this:

In a similar case, Michelle Carter was convicted in 2017 of involuntary manslaughter in the 2014 death of Conrad Roy III. Carter had urged Roy to kill himself via text messages.
A judge at the time determined that the then-17-year-old Carter caused Roy’s death when she ordered him in a phone call to get back in his carbon monoxide-filled truck that he’d parked in a Kmart parking lot.
Carter was sentenced to 15 months in prison.


Our last general election manifesto is here.
Our YouTube channel is here.
If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Inyoung You, 21, former Boston College student, arraigned in connection with boyfriend’s suicide death

Our thanks to Steve for this. The piece ends with this:

In a similar case, Michelle Carter was convicted in 2017 of involuntary manslaughter in the 2014 death of Conrad Roy III. Carter had urged Roy to kill himself via text messages.

A judge at the time determined that the then-17-year-old Carter caused Roy’s death when she ordered him in a phone call to get back in his carbon monoxide-filled truck that he’d parked in a Kmart parking lot.

Carter was sentenced to 15 months in prison.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

A woman lezplains: Women feeling attraction to men is a social construct.

Our thanks to Bryn for this.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Rachel Riley: "Jeremy Corbyn is a Racist"

Our thanks to a supporter for pointing us to this picture of Rachel Riley, the host of Countdown:

For us, Corbyn is a racist because he opposes protecting male minors born into Jewish and Muslim families from mutilation of their genitals – a crime under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, being at least ABH and almost certainly GBH. No exemptions from the law are permissible on religious or cultural grounds. He expressed support for Brit Milah – traditional Jewish circumcision – in an interview with the Jewish Chronicle in 2016, here.


Our last general election manifesto is here.
Our YouTube channel is here.
If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Rachel Riley: “Jeremy Corbyn is a Racist”

Rachel Riley is the host of Countdown. For us, Corbyn is a racist because he opposes protecting male minors born into Jewish and Muslim families from mutilation of their genitals – a crime under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, being at least ABH and almost certainly GBH. No exemptions from the law are permissible on religious or cultural grounds. He expressed support for Brit Milah – traditional Jewish circumcision – in an interview with the Jewish Chronicle in 2016, here.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

Today is the final day to respond to a consultation on false allegations

Our thanks to Dougie for this. We shall be responding to the consultation document today, and I urge you to do likewise, if you have an interest in this subject. Dougie writes:

Hello Mike,

Glad to see so much info in relation to International Men’s Day. My thanks to Elizabeth and yourself for sending it out.

Unfounded.org is an organisation to support men falsely accused of rape. They are requesting contact from other groups and individuals who are against false accusations of rape to see if together we can have a stronger voice to raise awareness. As you know from the other articles you have sent out, to be falsely accused of rape is simply torture.

All components of the criminal “justice” system are completely biased against the male defendant, the police routinely fail to conduct impartial investigation,the CPS will happily prosecute the most unbelievable cases, the law allows innocent men to be convicted on the words of liars, there is no compensation for men whose convictions are quashed, zero support from the so called “victims” commissioners – all women paid six-figure taxpayer-funded salaries, and I don’t need to mention media bias.

At worst you go to jail an innocent man (or commit suicide), at best your life and reputation can be ruined needlessly. The falsely accused have been totally abandoned by the justice system we need all the support we can get. The consultation is a way to register initial interest in support and start exchanging ideas.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

AUSTRALIA: Big win in Supreme Court case – universities' kangaroo courts are illegal

Wonderful news just in from Bettina Arndt:

Hello Everybody,
Sorry to bombard you. I had to share my really exciting news regarding my ongoing campaign to expose our universities’ kangaroo courts.
We have had a huge victory. The Queensland Supreme Court has just determined that universities have no jurisdiction to adjudicate sexual assault.
Justice Ann Lyons has just made a judgement in a pivotal case involving a University of Queensland medical student who was accused of sexual assault by another student. Wendy Mulcahy, the lawyer for the accused student, took the matter to the Supreme Court arguing that UQ did not have the jurisdiction to adjudicate such matters.
In her landmark judgement, Justice Lyons concluded universities are only entitled to make decisions in sexual assault cases which have been proved in criminal court. The university’s role is then to decide on any further penalty could be imposed on someone found criminally guilty of such a crime – such as expelling him or her from the university.
Here’s Lyon’s statement: “I consider that when read together, the University policy and procedures documents make it clear that the University only has jurisdiction in relation to criminal acts of a sexual nature where the alleged offence is proven. In my view that jurisdiction is limited to determining what penalty is to be imposed as a consequence of a finding that the alleged offence is proven.”
This means it is not the university’s job to investigate or determine the guilt in sexual assault cases. Lyon’s judgement brings into question the legality of the committees which have been established in universities across Australia to adjudicate these matters. Last month Senator Amanda Stoker grilled the university regulator, TEQSA, about the role of that organization in encouraging the establishment of these kangaroo courts. Lyon’s decision exposes TEQSA’s complicity in this issue as even more shameful.
Justice Lyons accepted Wendy Mulcahy’s concerns that a university committee is ill-equipped to conduct a fair investigation. She notes that “it would indeed be a startling result if a committee comprised of academics and students who are not required to have any legal training could decide allegations of a most serious kind without any of the protections of the criminal law.”
Since the University’s own policies state the University does not have jurisdiction over criminal acts, Lyons concludes that this “removes the jurisdiction of the University in relation to allegations of a criminal offence of a sexual nature.”
The Judge also drew attention to other legal cases which highlight the problems of University Disciplinary Boards providing fair treatment for the accused in such matters. “Those decisions outlined very real concerns about the disciplinary processes of the University and the lack of procedural fairness afforded to a student against whom allegations were made of sexual misconduct,” said Lyons.
This critical judgement has serious implications for our universities which have blundered into this territory in response to bullying from feminist lobby groups. It is quite extraordinary that none of the lawyers employed in the higher education sector anticipated the obvious legal pitfalls highlighted in Justice Lyon’s judgment – particularly in the light of the 200 plus cases where American colleges have lost significant law suits over failure to protect the due process rights of accused students.
Shame on our spineless university administrators for  kowtowing to the tiny, noisy group of feminist activists, selling out the reputation of our universities, and exposing the entire higher education sector to the risk of law suits over unfair and illegal handing of such matters.
Please help me circulate this wonderful news. Cheers, Tina.


Our last general election manifesto is here.
Our YouTube channel is here.
If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.

AUSTRALIA: Big win in Supreme Court case – universities’ kangaroo courts are illegal

Wonderful news just in from Bettina Arndt:

Hello Everybody,

Sorry to bombard you. I had to share my really exciting news regarding my ongoing campaign to expose our universities’ kangaroo courts.

We have had a huge victory. The Queensland Supreme Court has just determined that universities have no jurisdiction to adjudicate sexual assault.

Justice Ann Lyons has just made a judgement in a pivotal case involving a University of Queensland medical student who was accused of sexual assault by another student. Wendy Mulcahy, the lawyer for the accused student, took the matter to the Supreme Court arguing that UQ did not have the jurisdiction to adjudicate such matters.

In her landmark judgement, Justice Lyons concluded universities are only entitled to make decisions in sexual assault cases which have been proved in criminal court. The university’s role is then to decide on any further penalty could be imposed on someone found criminally guilty of such a crime – such as expelling him or her from the university.

Here’s Lyon’s statement: “I consider that when read together, the University policy and procedures documents make it clear that the University only has jurisdiction in relation to criminal acts of a sexual nature where the alleged offence is proven. In my view that jurisdiction is limited to determining what penalty is to be imposed as a consequence of a finding that the alleged offence is proven.”

This means it is not the university’s job to investigate or determine the guilt in sexual assault cases. Lyon’s judgement brings into question the legality of the committees which have been established in universities across Australia to adjudicate these matters. Last month Senator Amanda Stoker grilled the university regulator, TEQSA, about the role of that organization in encouraging the establishment of these kangaroo courts. Lyon’s decision exposes TEQSA’s complicity in this issue as even more shameful.

Justice Lyons accepted Wendy Mulcahy’s concerns that a university committee is ill-equipped to conduct a fair investigation. She notes that “it would indeed be a startling result if a committee comprised of academics and students who are not required to have any legal training could decide allegations of a most serious kind without any of the protections of the criminal law.”

Since the University’s own policies state the University does not have jurisdiction over criminal acts, Lyons concludes that this “removes the jurisdiction of the University in relation to allegations of a criminal offence of a sexual nature.”

The Judge also drew attention to other legal cases which highlight the problems of University Disciplinary Boards providing fair treatment for the accused in such matters. “Those decisions outlined very real concerns about the disciplinary processes of the University and the lack of procedural fairness afforded to a student against whom allegations were made of sexual misconduct,” said Lyons.

This critical judgement has serious implications for our universities which have blundered into this territory in response to bullying from feminist lobby groups. It is quite extraordinary that none of the lawyers employed in the higher education sector anticipated the obvious legal pitfalls highlighted in Justice Lyon’s judgment – particularly in the light of the 200 plus cases where American colleges have lost significant law suits over failure to protect the due process rights of accused students.

Shame on our spineless university administrators for  kowtowing to the tiny, noisy group of feminist activists, selling out the reputation of our universities, and exposing the entire higher education sector to the risk of law suits over unfair and illegal handing of such matters.

Please help me circulate this wonderful news. Cheers, Tina.


Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.