Nuns arrested over Smyllum child abuse claims

Our thanks to Jean for this. The start of the piece:

Twelve people, some of them nuns, have been arrested over claims of abuse at a former children’s home in Lanarkshire.

Police said 11 women and one man – all aged between 62 and 85 – had been charged in connection with the abuse of children at Smyllum Park.

The home, which closed in 1981, was run by a Catholic order known as Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul.

Professor Geoff Dench obituary

Geoff Dench was a gentle, humorous man who possessed an eccentric streak

Times caption: Geoff Dench was a gentle, humorous man who possessed an eccentric streak

A piece in today’s Times:

An original and mischievous social scientist who enjoyed football and supported Arsenal, Geoff Dench was concerned with the fate of the men who once monopolised the terraces at many British grounds: the reduced status of the white working classes in the jobs market and the poor performance of their children in education.

Much of his work was politically controversial and awkwardly prophetic — at odds with most of his discipline — but driven by his concern for families and communities and the people at the heart of them.

He undertook his most important work at the Institute of Community Studies (ICS), which was founded by the Labour peer Michael Young in Bethnal Green, east London, and came to be regarded as a grandfather of the socially conservative strand of social democracy called “Blue Labour”.

His sympathetic understanding of white working-class resistance to large-scale immigration, most notably in his book The New East End, which was written with Kate Gavron and Young in 2006, and his critiques of meritocracy and feminism, foresaw the present political revolt against several aspects of modern liberalism.

He sometimes went to extraordinary lengths to find the data that would provide grist to the mill. On one occasion in the early 1990s there was an ambitious plan to re-examine a famous piece of research about family life in the East End, but nobody at the ICS knew where to find the original data. Dench started hunting high and low and managed to piece together old archives, manuscripts and notes that were scattered all over the place.

According to Jim Ogg, who collaborated with him on the project, “I remember coming in one morning only to find him sprawled on the floor in front of what resembled a giant Lego set, but what was in fact a reconstruction of the matrilineal ties of families in the Bethnal Green of the 1950s, with building blocks and pieces of string to indicate lineages.”

While Dench’s last few years were blighted by a brain disease that causes the body to gradually shut down, he was nursed through this period by his second wife, Belinda Brown, who collaborated with him on a range of projects about the family, the division of labour among men and women, grandparents and the role of men.

He was born in 1940 to lower middle-class parents in Brighton. His father, Herbert, was a dental technician who played the cello in the Brighton Philharmonic, while his mother, Edna, trained as an accountant. Herbert was in the Royal Army Medical Corps in Egypt and Palestine during the Second World War and did not return home until Geoff was five. His parents’ marriage seems not to have recovered from their wartime separation. They divorced when Dench was 18 and, even more unusually for the late 1950s, his mother went to work as an au pair in Italy.

He attended Varndean Grammar School for Boys, then went to Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, to study anthropology and archaeology. Like many people from non-elite backgrounds he found Cambridge difficult socially, and he did not flourish academically either, despite a keen and questioning mind. He did, however, strike up a lifelong friendship with a visiting fellow, Michael Young, later Lord Young of Dartington and the author of The Rise of the Meritocracy, and together they set up the Cambridge Sociology Society.

After Cambridge, Dench was attached to the London School of Economics, where he completed a PhD on the Maltese minority that dominated the Soho underworld in the 1950s, and was part of the expanding world of social science research, rubbing shoulders with many key figures, including Ernest Gellner, David Glass, Peter Laslett, Stan Cohen and Zygmunt Bauman.

He also started working at Lord Young’s ICS in Bethnal Green, where he met his first wife, Fanny Peterson, whose father ran University House, round the corner from the ICS, where they both lived. He experienced a somewhat stormy relationship — they were, in fact, married to each other twice — but he and Fanny had three daughters and in the 1970s made extended trips to Mauritius, Botswana and Lesotho on behalf of Lord Young’s International Extension College.

In the mid-1960s Dench had helped to establish the social policy and sociology department at Middlesex Polytechnic and, having been made a professor, headed the department before retiring in 1990. He was an effective and popular department head at Middlesex, combining charm and directness. Yet intellectually he was a member of the awkward squad, increasingly out of step with the progressive left and keen to return to the intellectual freedom of the ICS.

He later became increasingly dismayed at what he regarded as Labour’s abandonment of working-class solidarity in favour of an individualistic, rights-based vision of a socially mobile society. Meritocracy was inadequate as an organising principle, argued Dench, because it divided people too sharply into winners and losers.

His two most original contributions derive from a respect for tradition, acquired partly from his grounding in anthropology. The first was his understanding of how difficult and disruptive mass immigration can be for newcomers and existing communities; the second was his critique of feminism and its downplaying of the civilising role that family motivations play on men.

The first critique is found in a remarkable, but little known, book published in 1986, Minorities in the Open Society, in which he sees continuities between the colonial era and the desire of the emerging public sector elites to sponsor the new ethnic minorities in Britain’s “internal empire”. Often, this was against what was seen as a reactionary white working class.

He applied those ideas in The New East End, which recounted the sense of betrayal felt by working-class Eastenders who, after surviving the Blitz and being the crucible of the welfare reforms of 1945, were often dismayed to have to share their new inheritance with the Bangladeshi minority arriving in large numbers in the 1970s and 1980s. The dismay was especially acute in public housing that ceased to be a collective inheritance based on long-time residence and became an individual right based on need, which usually favoured large Bangladeshi families.

The second critique, of what he sometimes called “state feminism”, came in Transforming Men (1996), in which he uses the story of The Frog Prince to argue that women have always been the heart of society and that men are born into this through the civilising effect of family responsibilities and the role of the breadwinner.

Most versions of modern feminism, he argued, with their emphasis on female autonomy, have, however, abandoned this historic wisdom and made men, especially working-class men, feel superfluous. He pointed to the rising male suicide rate, the sharp fall in male participation in the labour market and the poor performance of white working-class boys in education.

In various publications for the Hera Trust he produced detailed analyses of opinion surveys to show that his apparently traditionalist views were in fact quite mainstream: most women do want male breadwinners, especially when they have young children, and men are far more likely to be motivated to work if they have long-term partners and children. He was a man of big ideas, but unusually committed to detailed surveys of what people actually think.

Dench’s views stuck out in the mainly liberal intellectual circles in which he continued to move, and he came in for sometimes angry criticism. He generally remained calm and courteous in response, and his wit and a mischievous glint in his eye were usually enough to defuse confrontation. (He was a handsome man, who was once mistaken for Sean Connery.)

A gentle, humorous man with an eccentric streak and a deep curiosity about human beings that he had the courage to pursue wherever it took him, he was horrified when the British National Party (BNP) embraced The New East End, and the party won some political support in part of Tower Hamlets in the early 1990s.

He remained involved with his three daughters from his marriage with Fanny: Kate, who trained as a doctor; Joanna, who is a lawyer; and Rainbow, who is an artist. He was a decent amateur footballer, and also a competent carpenter. He liked tinkering with technology, had a darkroom for photography and rigged up a speaker system to listen to records in the bath.

In his later years, and especially after his marriage to Belinda, with whom he had another daughter, Susanna, and a stepson, Tomek Stacharski, he became more conservative and religious. He embraced Anglo-Catholicism after having been raised a Methodist. He is survived by his wife, his former wife and his four daughters and stepson.

According to the Labour MP Frank Field, a friend and admirer, “Geoff’s brilliance lay in swimming against the tide that he thought was destructive of those basic forces which made people happy and gave a secure basis in which to raise children. His efforts to refocus on the role of men in society has yet to bear fruit.”

Professor Geoff Dench, social scientist and author, was born on August 14, 1940. He died from the effects of progressive supranuclear palsy on June 24, 2018, aged 77, while sitting in his garden

You can subscribe to The Times here.

Three teenage girls arrested after stolen car hits man, 60

A piece published online by The Times less than two hours ago:

A 14-year-old was one of three teenage girls arrested when a stolen car smashed into a 60-year-old man before careering into a front garden early this morning.

The victim was rushed to hospital in critical condition with severe head injuries after the crash in Kentish Town, north London.

The schoolgirls were arrested after the stolen silver Nissan Primera struck him at speed. Some houses were evacuated on police orders after the wrecked car began leaking petrol.

Three girls — 14, 16 and 17 — were later arrested on suspicion of causing serious injury by dangerous driving. They remain in custody at a north London police station.

Officers are appealing for witnesses and anyone with dash cam footage to come forward.

A Met Police spokesman said: “Police were called to Leighton Road, Kentish Town, at 2.35am to reports of a traffic collision.

“London Fire Brigade and London’s Air Ambulance also attended.

“At the scene a Nissan Primera vehicle had been in collision with a pedestrian and subsequently crashed into the front of garden of a house.

“The pedestrian, a man in his 60s, was taken to hospital by paramedics having suffered a severe head injury. His condition is critical. The injured man’s family has been notified.

“The occupants of the vehicle, which is believed to have been stolen, made off from the scene on foot.

“Road closures and cordons have been established and significant disruption is expected. Motorists are advised to avoid the area where possible.

“Officers from the Met’s Serious Collision Investigation Unit are on scene and dealing.”

He added: “Following initial police enquiries, officers arrested three females aged 17, 16 and 14 on suspicion of causing serious injury by dangerous driving.

“They have been taken to a north London police station where they remain at this time.

“Inquiries are ongoing.”

You can subscribe to The Times here.

The UN removes online access to its 2012 report, “VIOLATING CHILDREN’S RIGHTS: Harmful practices based on tradition, culture, religion or superstition”

We’ve just received the following email from the American anti-MGM campaigner Tim Hammond, who gave an interesting presentation at the 2016 London conference:

Colleagues,

I just discovered that the 2012 report to the UN about violence against children resulting from harmful traditional practices is no longer available at this URL:

http://srsg.violenceagainstchildren.org/sites/default/files/documents/docs/InCo_Report_15Oct.pdf

I have searched the SRSG Violence Against Children website and cannot find the report.

Fortunately, that report is preserved on my CircumcisionHarm.org website, as well as on the CRIN site here: https://www.crin.org/docs/InCo_Report_15Oct.pdf

You will want to make note of this and adjust your links to this report if you have any on your websites or when making reference to this report in the future.

Please share this notice with others you may see who were not copied by this email.

In unity for the children,

Tim Hammond

 

What do women want from the Conservative party?

As a measure of how far the Conservative party has sold out to feminism, an event titled “What do women want from the Conservative party?”, to be held near the Conservative party conference on 1 October, takes some beating. Details and ticket applications here. Quite apart from the fact that nobody is asking, “What do men want from the Conservative party?”, the event is being co-hosted by the Fawcett Society.

What of the other co-host, Women2Win? From their website:

Women2Win are leading the campaign to elect more Conservative women to Parliament with the support of a broad cross section of men and women from the Conservative Party.

Our mission is to ensure the Conservative Party is representative of the British people and fairly represent women at all levels of politics. Women2Win aims to increase the number of Conservative women in Parliament and in public life, and is committed to identifying, training and mentoring female candidates for public office.

Women2Win was founded in 2005 by Baroness Jenkin of Kennington and Rt. Hon Theresa May MP to address the need for more female Conservative candidates and MPs. [J4MB: What need? At the height of its electoral success the party had considerably fewer female MPs than it does today.]

In 2005 there were just 17 Conservative women MPs, representing only 9% of the parliamentary party. Now, after thirteen years and three elections, there are 67 Conservative women MPs, which is over 20%- but not enough! We also assist high calibre women seeking public appointments as well as Councillors, Association Officers and Police and Crime Commissioners.

Women2Win is campaigning to promote the brightest and best women the party has to offer and further convince Conservative Associations of the benefits of putting their trust in female candidates. We believe that if the gender balance of candidates reflects that of modern Britain, the Conservative Party will increase its support at the ballot box. [J4MB emphasis. This is self-serving nonsense on stilts. The Conservative party won the last election despite having the smallest proportion of female candidates among the three largest parties.]

In 2005 we were grateful to have the support of David Cameron MP when he identified that more needed to be done to tackle the lack of female representation in Parliament. We continue to make that change a reality. Britain needs a modern and rejuvenated Conservative Party, made up of the most talented and able women and men the Party has to offer – and because of this, the Conservative Party needs Women2Win.

The speakers at the event include Baroness Jenkin, Amber Rudd MP, Chris Skidmore MP, and Sam Smethers, Chief Executive of the Fawcett Society.

BBC Horizon: Stopping Male Suicide

The BBC has just broadcast an hour-long Horizon documentary, “Stopping Male Suicide”. BBC licence fee payers can watch the programme on iPlayer – here – for the next 29 days. It’s well worth watching, but predictably an obvious question wasn’t asked, and therefore wasn’t addressed:

Are men more likely than women to suffer the deeply stressful life events which increase the risk of committing suicide?

Followers of this blog won’t need reminding that the answer to the question is a resounding YES. Those life events include:

  • denial of access to children, following family breakdowns
  • denial of support to male victims of domestic violence
  • financial devastation following divorce
  • homelessness (90% of the street homeless are men)

The state, through its actions and inactions, is responsible for most male suicide.

The programme sought to attribute the high male suicide rate to the usual litany of explanations, including:

  • mental health issues (although women suffer more from mental health issues)
  • men not seeking help, not talking about their problems. What can a mental health professional do to help fathers gain access to their children following family breakdowns? Nothing.
  • more lethal methods of attempting suicide, compared with women. The possibility that men choose those methods because they’re genuinely seeking to end their lives, while many (most?) female suicide “attempts” are cries for help, wasn’t even considered as a possibility

The issue of suicide was explored in our 2015 general election manifesto (pp. 46-8).

My article on male suicide, and the contribution of reactive depression resulting from stressful life events, published by the International Business Times in 2015, is here.