Our thanks to James for this.
Month: July 2018
Review: Why Will No-One Publish My Novel? A Handbook for the Rejected Writer, by Fay Weldon – useful advice for new authors.
I confess to having a soft spot for Fay Wedon, 87, in part because sometimes she’s searingly honest in her books, occasionally upsetting feminists, which can only be a good thing, obviously. On the first page of What Makes Women Happy (2006) we find this:
The brutal answer to what makes women happy is, “Nothing, not for more than ten minutes at a time.”
I was interested to read a review of Weldon’s latest book Why Will No-One Publish My Novel? A Handbook for the Rejected Writer in yesterday’s Sunday Times:
Fay Weldon is well placed to compose a handbook for the “rejected writer”. With 34 novels to her name, as well as plays and television dramas (including the pilot of Upstairs, Downstairs), she has clearly “learnt how to have nothing turned down”.
In Why Will No-One Publish My Novel?, she offers tips and emotional support for the would-be novelist, imagining that he or she is in low spirits after a sixth rejection. Usefully, a sizeable chunk is given over to diagnosis: Weldon offers nine possible reasons why the novel in question isn’t setting the publishing industry alight. These range from the consoling (the subject matter is too radical for namby-pamby agents) to the more brutally realistic: the novel has “nothing to say”.
Some of her advice is useful. Novels are unwieldy and her suggestion that writers boil theirs down to a single “Cosmic Statement” could prove clarifying. For writers in search of a subject, she suggests using press cuttings, like Flaubert, or Latin tags. Elizabeth I’s motto, video et taceo (I see and keep silent), could engender a CIA thriller called The Witness. Other advice is less valuable, such as the suggestion that aspiring authors “look up structure/novel-writing on Google”. Weldon’s warnings that women characters today can no longer be “passive” is so obvious as to be condescending.
Perhaps most pertinent are her observations about today’s books business, which is dictated, she complains, by “vile commercialism”. Editorial judgments are often trumped by decisions made in the marketing department; a pretty young author might outsell an older one with more wisdom to impart. Publishers’ offices do not smell of mahogany and printing ink, and those pulling the strings are as flawed as the writers they are rejecting — in their droves.
The reviewer was Leaf Arbuthnot (image below). She’s a staff feature writer and editor at the Sunday Times and critic for the Times Literary Supplement. Her debut novel is expected in 2020.
![]()
A sentence from her review was outrageous, in my view:
Weldon’s warnings that women characters today can no longer be “passive” is so obvious as to be condescending.
It’s shocking that Fay Weldon (at 87) would make such a ridiculous statement, and even more shocking that a young women condescendingly accuses her of being condescending. So fiction must no longer include “passive” women characters? What a condescending attack on reality that is. Let’s not forget the mantra:
Women are strong!
Women are amazing!!
Let’s repeat those lies endlessly, so people believe them to be true!!!
You can subscribe to The Times here.
A festival of one’s own, with no men allowed (the “vaginal steaming” might deter them, anyway)
A piece in today’s Times:
There will be meditation, feminist debate [J4MB: Sounds like fun…] and a chance to rekindle the art of ancient handcrafts — all in the name of the sisterhood.
Woman Fest, open to anyone who “identifies as a woman”, is billed as an attempt to explore the power and magic that women can create together.
While there won’t be loud rock music or mosh pits, there will be sacred sexuality workshops, wild foraging, and even vaginal steaming, the alternative health treatment popularised by the actress Gwyneth Paltrow that is said to help with menstrual cramps.
Guests are encouraged to put on workshops based around their skills.
Tiana Jacout, 30, co-founder of the festival, said she was inspired by the women’s marches and Me Too and Time’s Up campaigns. She hopes to draw a crowd of 400 people when it is held next month on a farm near Frome, Somerset.
“It’s an extraordinary time to be a woman as we see the old patterns and oppression being shrugged off,” she said.
“That’s why we made Woman Fest: it’s a shameless celebration of all that makes us! To gather in a space with women of all shapes, sizes, [J4MB: The event will be a magnet for 300+ kilo women] colours, . . . to reconnect and grow the network of empowered and authentic women.”
She hopes that the festival will provide women with the space, without men, to share experiences and ideas. She told The Observer: “[It] will celebrate women’s creativity and potential: it’s all about realising what we can do and be, and sharing our gifts freely.”
There will be an expression stage, where anyone can perform, and a creativity tent for workshops. In the women’s circle participants will be invited to share stories, songs or prayers, while the sacred womb tent will be a “space for contemplation”.
The festival is from August 16-19. Tickets cost £225, with profits to be shared with the tree-planting charity Tree Sisters.
A comment from John Barleycorn:
So it could be crashed by thousands of men self-identifying as women?
Who’s up for it?
You can subscribe to The Times here.
Bad move? Man given job to promote women’s chess.
A piece in today’s Times:
The English Chess Federation has been criticised by female players after giving a man the job of promoting the game to women.
One applicant, a senior HR executive in her forties, was not interviewed for the director of women’s chess post, it is claimed. She is an expert player who specialises in recruiting women to male-dominated fields.
The other, a chess-playing lawyer in her thirties, said she was offered the opportunity to shadow the male candidate who was eventually successful.
The directorship, previously held by former England international Sarah Longson, was abolished in February, but reinstated after a series of complaints.
However, after a man was appointed this week campaigners have accused the ECF, the organisation that runs England’s national team and the British Championship, of being out of touch with wider efforts to get more women in leadership roles.
Amanda Ross, who founded the London’s Casual Chess group to encourage more women to play, said: “Chess is already a sausagefest. [J4MB: Classy. An activity dominated by women would be a …? And what is “casual chess”? Is that a euphemism for “poor chess”?] This is a lost opportunity to put a highly qualified woman in a leadership role. We refuse to be squeezed out of the game.”
England’s number one female player, Jovanka Houska, said: “That is very strange because it is very important to have female presence on the board.” [J4MB: WHY is it “very important”?]
The ECF’s choice for the role was Chris Fegan, 59, a chess tutor.
He said: “I am looking forward to working to change the culture of the game in this country. With the imbalance between the numbers of men and women playing chess, it is obvious that a key focus is boosting the participation of women in chess at all levels.” [J4MB: Other than at the top level, obviously, where women don’t compete successfully. Hence the absurdity of women-only chess tournaments.]
You can subscribe to The Times here.
Eddie Mair quits BBC after refusing cut to £300k salary
A piece in today’s Times:
Eddie Mair, the presenter of Radio 4’s PM programme, has quit the BBC for commercial radio after refusing to agree a new deal on reduced pay.
The Times revealed last month that Mair was the last high-profile male BBC News presenter holding out against pressure to accept a cut as the corporation struggles to close its gender pay gap.
Yesterday the 52-year-old confirmed that he would be leaving the BBC after 30 years. He is set to join the commercial talk station LBC and as much as double his salary. [J4MB emphasis]
The BBC is desperate to drive down the pay of several men before the publication of the updated list of “on-air talent” salaries next week.
It was also announced yesterday that the Radio 2 host Jeremy Vine would be stepping down as presenter of BBC One’s viewer feedback programme Points of View after 10 years, reducing his total salary.
Mair has become one of the most familiar and popular voices on BBC radio since taking over as sole presenter of PM, Radio 4’s afternoon news programme, in 2003. He joined the corporation in 1987, starting at Radio Scotland.
His conversations with Steve Hewlett about The Media Show host’s terminal cancer attracted particular praise, as did his combative interview with Boris Johnson while standing in on The Andrew Marr Show in 2013.
However, he infuriated bosses by refusing to accepting a cut to his £300,000-£350,000 salary after the gender equality row engulfed the BBC last year. Male colleagues including John Humphrys, Nick Robinson, Huw Edwards, Nicky Campbell, Andrew Marr and Vine all agreed reductions.
The presenter’s resignation statement was characteristically droll.
“I thought this was the appropriate moment to step out and give someone else a chance, before I’m so old my sentences make no lasagne,” he said. “I’m going to miss the PM team, and Tony Hall’s aftershave.
“I realise the BBC will close down without me and there will be a run on the pound but I can’t stay in an organisation that refused to let me host Songs of Praise. I bought a jacket and everything. I’m truly grateful to the BBC, however, for being given more opportunities over the years than I deserved. Whoever comes next will be getting the best job in the BBC and I honestly wish them the very best.”
Fran Unsworth, director of BBC News, said: “He is one of the outstanding broadcasters of his generation and his new employer is very lucky to have him.”
Mair’s last PM will be on Friday August 17. The BBC has yet to reveal his successor.
You can subscribe to The Times here.
Participants Required, to take part in a study of men who have been forced to penetrate women
This Week in Stupid episode: Toxic Femininity
Our thanks to Max for highlighting this great episode of Sargon of Akkad’s ‘This Week in Stupid’.
Topics explored include false allegations and “equal pay”.
Alex Goldman, 22, is suing Catherine Reddington, 22, for $6million, claiming her false rape accusation at a frat party has destroyed his life
Our thanks to Mike P for this. The start of the piece:
A college student is suing a woman for $6million because he says her unsubstantiated claims that he raped her after a drunken frat party have ‘destroyed’ his life.
Catherine Reddington, 22, has claimed repeatedly via social media that Alex Goldman raped her following a party in April last year at Syracuse University’s Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity in upstate New York.
She informed police and the university of the rape accusations in the days after the party and has taken to social media several times in the past month to reveal the details of her alleged assault.
Goldman, also 22, was expelled from Syracuse University after the claims surfaced and more recently was fired from his summer internship with an engineering firm when his accuser informed them of the allegations.
He was never arrested or charged over the incident.
‘During the early hours of April 23, 2017 I was raped and sodomized. I woke up in Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity in Alex Goldman’s bed confused, bloody, bruised, with ripped clothing and splinter,’ Reddington wrote on Facebook on June 4.
‘Alex Goldman is a rapist.’
A police investigation into the allegations found no evidence that Reddington had been raped or even had a sexual encounter with Goldman that night.
The investigation, which involved a medical exam and rape kit within 26 hours of the alleged incident, found Reddington had no internal cuts or abrasions in her vagina and that there was no traces of Goldman’s DNA.
Jordan Holbrook – Prostate Cancer UK March for Men
Schoolgirls face ban on skirts
A piece in today’s Sunday Times:
For schoolgirls, the skirt is on the way out. An analysis of the uniform policies of schools in England shows that at least 40 secondaries have stopped girls from wearing them, while others are consulting on a ban.
The change to trousers comes as schools opt for gender-neutral uniforms to cater for transgender pupils.
Priory School in Lewes, East Sussex, which banned skirts last year, said pupils had questioned why its uniform was different for boys and girls, and that the needs of transgender students must be taken into account. Crawshaw Academy, near Leeds, is “consulting on implementing a gender-neutral uniform (trousers only)”.
Copleston High School, in Ipswich, has placed skirts on a list of unacceptable items alongside “skinny jeans and facial piercings”. Skirts at Woodhey High School, in Bury, were deemed “undignified and embarrassing” for staff and visitors when girls sit on the floor for assembly and in drama classes.
The moves by schools come as the government prepares to clarify the rights of transgender people in changes to the Gender Recognition Act. A consultation paper is expected on Tuesday.
Feminists this weekend condemned the bans, arguing that all children should be offered a choice. Naomi Wolf, the American writer, said: “I think that trousers-only for everyone is a silly way to go — unless you are going to also offer the option of skirts-only for everyone. I believe that if everyone is offered the option of both skirts and trousers, everyone can find his, her or their comfortable fit.”
In Bradford, numerous schools with a high proportion of Muslim pupils do not allow skirts on modesty grounds. Bans are also common in Leeds and Grimsby. In Ipswich, eight secondary schools prohibit them, which means the majority of girls attend “trouser-only” schools.
Some schools, however, are fighting a rearguard action to save the skirt. Pupils at Philips High School, in Bury, which is planning to make wearing trousers compulsory for both boys and girls next year, have gathered hundreds of signatures on a petition arguing that a ban on skirts is “sexualising” pupils’ bodies. Its female pupils also argue that they feel more confident in skirts and forcing them into trousers could “damage our mental health”.
“If any teacher believes seeing a child’s leg is in any way ‘too sexual’,” states the petition, “they should be sacked immediately for gross misconduct.”
You can subscribe to The Times here.
