Marissa Louise Cheeseman, 37, falsely claimed she had been kidnapped and raped by two men in Whitby. Wasted over 200 hours of police time. Conditional discharge, £20 surcharge.

Our thanks to Len for this. The end of the piece:

After more than 208 hours of police time, it became clear the allegations were untrue. Cheeseman was arrested and charged with the offence of causing wasteful employment of police.

She pleaded guilty at Maidstone Magistrates Court and has now been given a 12-month conditional discharge as well as being ordered to pay a surcharge of £20.

Detective Inspector Glenn Kelly of Scarborough Serious Crime Team, said: “The time and resources dedicated to this extremely serious allegation reflected the gravitas with which we regard all such reports.

“It is very frustrating for everyone involved in such an intensive investigation to find that the report was made up. Particularly when there are genuine victims of crime who need our help.” [J4MB: Not a word of sympathy for the falsely accused men.]

He added: “We may never know what motivated Cheeseman to make such claims, [J4MB: Maybe a combination of a rape fantasy, narcissism, and the knowledge she wouldn’t face adequate punishment?] but what is of concern is that false reports undermine genuine victims of serious sexual crime.” [J4MB: This claim is invariably trotted out parrot-fashion in such cases, but it is never explained HOW false reports undermine genuine victims of serious sexual crime. They don’t.]

 

Lindsay Shepherd launches $3.6M lawsuit for university free speech abuses

The story of the teaching assistant harassed by Human Relations authoritarians at Laurier University (after playing footage of Jordan Peterson to her class) thickens. After winning the intellectual battle, and securing an apology from the university, Shepherd has launched a lawsuit that could go a long way towards protecting freedom of speech in Canadian higher education.

Read more at the Toronto Sun.

Netflix Bans Flirting Among Colleagues

Image from The Sun

Bizarre and hilarious rules of conduct for staff have been established by Netflix. The response from the bewildered cast and crew on the first film set to be affected, Black Mirror in London, was irreverent humour – with people reportedly looking at each other, counting to five, then diverting their eyes. I imagine they may have felt like they were living in an episode of the dystopian series!

An extreme example of the kind of environments #MeToo is spawning, and surely an over-dramatic death throe of intrusive, authoritarian, bloated Human Relations departments in the workplace.

Humans are a sexually reproducing species and, when you put them into close contact in places of work, flirting is a virtually inevitable consequence. Sometimes it will be welcomed and can even lead to serious relationships, sometimes it is ill-judged with comic, tragic or simply uncomfortable results (possibly depending on your perspective). But, in the vast majority of cases, individuals are able to manage such situations quite well on their own.

Sadiq Khan takes the Sex War to Wikipedia

As part of Sadiq Khan’s #BehindEveryGreatCity campaign, today “Schoolgirls from across the city will be joining forces with Wikipedia’s experts and women in the tech industry to create a surge in new pages about women, and to add more detail to existing ones.”

According to Sadiq, writing in The Telegraph, the facts that 83% of Wikipedia biographies are about men and that 87% of editors are men is a “woefully inaccurate reflection of women’s achievements” that “has to change” in order to “level the playing field”…

As Sadiq acknowledges, there are no barriers to women editing Wikipedia pages – it would simply appear that more men are more interested in contributing.

I look forward to Sadiq’s battle against Instagram’s 58% female user skew and Pinterest’s 71% female user skew.

Our thanks to Ray for the link to the Tweet and the Telegraph article.

Rod at Speakers’ Corner: “Feminism’s goal has always been the destruction of the family”

A tip of the hat to Ewan Jones for filming and editing this (video, 28:58). Rod was speaking two days ago. I’m full of admiration for people like Ewan and Rod who stand up and tell the truth on gender issues at Speakers’ Corner. I don’t have the patience to deal with the inevitable hecklers, so I campaign on MGM instead, meeting with many Muslims and a smaller number of Jews each time.

What happens when women break through the “stained-glass ceiling”

Rev Jules Gomes will be among the speakers at the coming conference. His talk title will be, “Singing in the ruins: How feminists have destroyed the Church of England beyond repair”.

A piece in today’s Times by Oliver Moody, Science Correspondent:

The first woman to become a senior Anglican bishop has questioned whether people can really have love or hope if they do not believe in God.

The Right Rev Rachel Treweek shattered the so-called “stained-glass ceiling” when she was made Bishop of Gloucester in 2015, less than a year after the Church of England had voted to allow women to join its House of Bishops.

At the time, she said that she would encourage British Christians to “speak out with confidence about their faith” after years of reticence over mounting robust public defences of Anglican belief.

Last weekend the bishop, 55, made good on that pledge with an unusually muscular account of her Christian values. At a Cheltenham science festival event on the role of communities in an increasingly secular age, she argued that the church still occupied a crucial position in British society.

“Provocatively, I want to question whether you can truly have love and hope without faith,” she said. “Real love and hope for me come from knowing that I am loved and I can have hope because I’m loved, that my shame and my guilt are dealt with.”

She added: “The only place where there is really unconditional love is in God.”

Her remarks drew a strong response from Alom Shaha, author of The Young Atheist’s Handbook. He said that he had become a father last year and loved his baby daughter unconditionally in spite of having no religious faith. “I find it deeply worrying when people say you can’t experience love with their fellow human beings,” Mr Shaha said.

After the event, the bishop told The Times that she did not mean atheists and agnostics could not have love or hope at all, but that there was an ever-present danger that these emotions would be mixed with others, such as the fear of being left on one’s own.

You can subscribe to The Times here.

Doctors and nurses (majority: female) who kill will not be sacked for ‘honest mistakes’

Nursing has always been a female-dominated profession, and the proportion of doctors who are female has been rising for over years. A majority of GPs today are female. So we shouldn’t be too surprised that the government plans to extend unaccountability to doctors and nurses who kill patients through “honest mistakes”, presumably a combination in most cases of incompetence, laziness, lack of concern for patients, and other factors. When a large majority of doctors were men, such a proposal would have been unthinkable.

A piece in today’s Times, by Lucy Bannerman and Kat Lay:

Doctors and nurses who make “honest mistakes” while treating patients should not fear criminal prosecution, Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, will say today, under rules that will make it more difficult for the regulator to strike off staff convicted of manslaughter.

Mr Hunt has accepted the main findings of a review into the use of gross negligence manslaughter in healthcare, which said that criminal proceedings should apply only in extreme cases of “very poor performance”.

He ordered the inquiry by Professor Sir Norman Williams, former president of the Royal College of Surgeons, after the case of Hadiza Bawa-Garba, a trainee paediatrician found guilty of gross negligence manslaughter over the death of Jack Adcock, six, who developed sepsis at Leicester Royal Infirmary. The General Medical Council (GMC) and the boy’s family wanted her struck off but doctors said that criminalising clinical errors would create a “chilling effect” that could lead to mistakes being repeated.

The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service gave her a 12-month suspension. The GMC won an appeal at the High Court but Bawa-Garba is now in the process of a new appeal.

In his report Sir Norman recommends that the GMC be stripped of the power to pursue appeals. Such decisions should be appealed only by the Professional Standards Authority.

Nicky Adcock, Jack’s mother, said that the move was a disgrace. She said: “I don’t believe Bawa-Garba woke up that morning intending to kill Jack. But she didn’t just make one or two errors — she made 21, all her own.” The report also said that doctors’ personal case notes should not be available to regulators investigating fitness to practice, to help staff to reflect openly and honestly on potential improvements and reassure them that their notes would not be used against them.

It also urged a “clearer understanding” of where the bar is set for gross negligence manslaughter prosecutions in healthcare, to reassure staff that it applies “to cases of very poor performance, rather than honest mistakes”.

Sir Norman said that he hoped that greater clarity and consistency would “lead to fewer criminal investigations which are limited to just those rare cases where an individual’s performance is so truly exceptionally bad that it requires a criminal sanction”.

Mr Hunt said that he would be acting on the report’s recommendation so that the NHS could move “from a blame culture to a learning culture”. He also said that all patient deaths in the NHS would be looked at by a new system of medical examiners, who could refer cases to coroners if necessary, with the aim of providing families with more information about a death and sharing more data to prevent avoidable deaths.

The GMC said that it was “disappointed” by the findings. Sir Terence Stephenson, its chairman, said: “Our appeals have been upheld in 16 out of 18 cases heard by the courts. We believe our actions have provided greater public safety and maintained public confidence in the profession.”

Behind the story

Jack Adcock died in 2011
Jack Adcock died in 2011PA

Hadiza Bawa-Garba was on duty at Leicester Royal Infirmary in 2011 when Jack Adcock, a boy with Down’s syndrome and a heart condition, arrived with diarrhoea and vomiting (Lucy Bannerman writes).

The paediatric registrar, then 35, did not follow up on abnormal tests quickly, did not call in a consultant and missed what an expert described as a “barn-door obvious” case of sepsis.

She then told a crash team to stop resuscitation without looking at Jack’s notes because she had mistaken him for another patient. Although this did not contribute to Jack’s death, the trial judge said that the “extraordinary” error illustrated how bad her care was. In 2015 she received a two-year suspended sentence. Bawa-Garba was one of two people found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence over Jack’s death. The other was a nurse, Isabel Amaro. Both were given two-year terms, suspended for two years. [J4MB emphasis] Amaro was struck off in 2016.

You can subscribe to The Times here.

Teenagers howl over hardest exams yet

It was always inevitable that reversing the decades-long trend of grade inflation would cause unhappiness for pupils, as many would not get the inflated grades they were expecting under the anti-meritocratic “all shall have prizes” education philosophy. A piece in yesterday’s Sunday Times by Sian Griffiths, Education Editor:

She has spent months cramming for her A-levels and her revision tips are watched by millions of pupils, but last week the vlogger known as UnJaded Jadewas in tears after sitting her biology paper.

Jade Bowler, 18, from Berkshire, who has a place to read biology at Bristol University if she scores AAB in her exams, said: “The paper had 42 pages. It was so hard. I didn’t even finish it. Everyone in the exam room burst into tears, including me. My heart has never beat so quickly.”

Bowler is not alone. Pupil panic over the hardest GCSEs and A-levels yet set in England has exploded in schools and across the internet, with teenagers posting angst-ridden messages — and expletives — about their experiences.

About 750,000 teenagers are sitting the tough new GCSEs and A-levels this summer. It is the first year that reforms have meant more difficult papers in most subjects, with a scale of 9 to 1 replacing the old A* to G grades in most GCSEs.

The biggest exam shake-up in a generation was the brainchild of Michael Gove during his time as education secretary. It was designed to drive up standards, bring England into line with top-performing systems in the Far East and identify academic high-fliers for top universities.

This weekend, the education expert Alan Smithers warned:

• About 1,000 16-year-olds will score the new top grade of 9 in all their GCSEs, compared with tens of thousands who scored eight or more A* grades last year. Andrew Halls, headmaster of King’s College School, in Wimbledon, southwest London, where 50% of 16-year-olds scored 10 A*s in their GCSEs last year, said he had already written to parents to warn them not to expect “full houses of grade 9s”.

• Private schools are likely to widen their lead over state schools because many have refused to test the new GCSEs and are instead entering pupils for the International GCSE, an older exam many believe to be easier.

Head teachers and parents warned this weekend that many teenagers were struggling to cope.

The Sunday Times phoned several schools to find out how pupils were faring and found that teachers were deploying a variety of new strategies to help their charges succeed. Some schools are running revision classes at 7.30am before the exams start. Others are sending teachers to anxious pupils’ houses to make sure they turn up.

At The Malling School, in Kent, head teacher Carl Roberts said one pupil had broken his glasses on purpose in an attempt to avoid sitting the tests. One bright pupil broke down in tears in a GCSE exam and another had a panic attack. “Why are we insisting that all pupils, from grammar schools through to special needs pupils, have to sit the same GCSEs?” asked one teacher.

“I act as a scribe to some of the pupils and it’s so sad to see them look beaten before they even enter the room. It’s obvious some of them have quite simply given up,” said another.

The trickiest problems find their way onto the internet, such as a biology GCSE question about why carrots do not increase in mass when they are boiled.

The entrepreneur and Dragons’ Den judge Peter Jones, whose daughter Natalia is taking the new exams, said they were far too academic for many teenagers, who need different skills to succeed in the modern workplace.

“I have watched the higher levels of stress Natalia has experienced compared with her two older siblings who took the older exams,” said Jones, who has campaigned for years for a GCSE in enterprise. “She has worked incredibly hard and has got through but it is taking up almost every waking hour.”

The Department for Education said: “We trust schools not to put undue pressure on young people when administering exams.”

You can subscribe to The Times here.