My own, admittedly limited, experience in this area suggests that perhaps 90 % of male / female interactions are, in some way or another, mis communcations to the extent I’m surprised anything happens at all….
Science again confirms what the gender traditionalists have known for years, much to the surprise of feminists in denial about their own proclivities everywhere. There was a reason (in a post-traditional era of crashing marriage and birthrates) that ancient societies used to really on the craggy and toothless older generations forcing the youth into marriage with each other (obviously the match would be chosen with as many social advantages as you could cram in, but there was also an underlying purpose to it). It wasn’t a perfect system, with plenty of murders and assaults required to force the unwilling to toe the line (just look at the honour killings in primitive places like Pakistan’s tribal areas if you want to see examples of what I mean). But we will need to address the issues it did, before we abandoned it, or they will also cause us trouble (in a way they already did, back when the crime wave that lasted into the 1990s hit; plenty of single mums raised the hoodies and thugs who went on to cause chaos as a result).
A paper with the title Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers found that when male students propositioned females with, “I think you are very attractive (a) would you come out with me tonight, or (b) would you come over to my apartment tonight or (c) would you go to bed with me tonight”, the percentages of yes were 50% for a date, 0% for visiting the apartment and 0% for bed.
However, when females asked males the same questions the responses were 50%, 69% and 69%, randy fellows. Clearly there are no difference between men and women at all, except in this vector. Ha, Ha.
Justice for Men & Boys 
My own, admittedly limited, experience in this area suggests that perhaps 90 % of male / female interactions are, in some way or another, mis communcations to the extent I’m surprised anything happens at all….
LikeLike
Science again confirms what the gender traditionalists have known for years, much to the surprise of feminists in denial about their own proclivities everywhere. There was a reason (in a post-traditional era of crashing marriage and birthrates) that ancient societies used to really on the craggy and toothless older generations forcing the youth into marriage with each other (obviously the match would be chosen with as many social advantages as you could cram in, but there was also an underlying purpose to it). It wasn’t a perfect system, with plenty of murders and assaults required to force the unwilling to toe the line (just look at the honour killings in primitive places like Pakistan’s tribal areas if you want to see examples of what I mean). But we will need to address the issues it did, before we abandoned it, or they will also cause us trouble (in a way they already did, back when the crime wave that lasted into the 1990s hit; plenty of single mums raised the hoodies and thugs who went on to cause chaos as a result).
LikeLike
A paper with the title Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers found that when male students propositioned females with, “I think you are very attractive (a) would you come out with me tonight, or (b) would you come over to my apartment tonight or (c) would you go to bed with me tonight”, the percentages of yes were 50% for a date, 0% for visiting the apartment and 0% for bed.
However, when females asked males the same questions the responses were 50%, 69% and 69%, randy fellows. Clearly there are no difference between men and women at all, except in this vector. Ha, Ha.
LikeLike