6 thoughts on “Two bouncers, one protester: minister for men campaign kicks off”
“Specific problems can affect one gender over another, but that’s not a reason to create a whole cult and movement.” The hypocrisy of feminism is breathtaking.
It is indeed the irony of the comment “Men have the upper hand in so many more ways than other groups,” he said. “Specific problems can affect one gender over another, but that’s not a reason to create a whole cult and movement.” No doubt lost on Guardianistas. Interesting that it was a young man who protested. I actually have some hope in this, as because of their exposure to propaganda in education, such men are more aware of “Gender” and may well see the hypocrisy. Dr Farrell being an example. The advance of feminism in recent years really reflects the fact that men (and women) have simply left the field open for them, allowing them to take up space as “experts”. If more men took an interest I suspect, like the partner of a prominent current feminist, they will find it hypocritical and “like being shouted at all the time for something I haven’t done”.
Which is why I think it important to highlight obvious “specific problems” such as in education, health, family, housing, suicide. Where the stats. are widely accepted and the politically motivated inaction clear (see Jess laugh)
Even though my “red pill” has to do with DA and there are obvious gross perversions of justice in sexual offences I have to admit in a deeply gynocentric culture men are easily persuaded to white knightery to defend “our girls” over such issues .
I admit to being both ignorant and confused when J4MB took up MGM in a big way. But as a political issue it makes no possible challenge to women, is clearly unethical in the context where for instance one needs to be 18 to get a tattoo and challenges feminists who claim its “about all people” to join in a child protection issue. Their inaction and hostility exposing the hypocrisy constantly.
Rather like PT in Canada younger men have been persuaded feminists are about equality for all. And in fact in conversation I find many presume some of the issues that have received coverage in recent years , education attainment, university, suicide, homelessness (even Domestic Abuse) are being tackled for males as much as females. If they took just a bit more interest they’d soon find that is not the case. The challenge is not to “fight” the feminists head on (they will not change their creed) but undermine their position as sole experts on these issues in the corridors of power. To get more to see the emperor has no clothes.
Mike can you give us a brief summary of the story here please? I really don’t want to visit the Guardian website and boost their “visitor” statistics.
They will use my click to pretend to themselves and Google that their political views are really popular so they should get more in advertising fees. You can always say you were quoting the article “for the purposes of review” – that usually allows a few illustrative lines to be quoted.
By the way, in a recent piece you said to practice tax avoidance to starve the state of funds (because those funds will inevitably be spent on women at the expense of men). I emphatically agree – would it be worth having a section on your site dedicated to useful practical tips on how we can do this?
Justice for Men & Boys 
“Specific problems can affect one gender over another, but that’s not a reason to create a whole cult and movement.” The hypocrisy of feminism is breathtaking.
LikeLike
Good point Nick
LikeLike
It is indeed the irony of the comment “Men have the upper hand in so many more ways than other groups,” he said. “Specific problems can affect one gender over another, but that’s not a reason to create a whole cult and movement.” No doubt lost on Guardianistas. Interesting that it was a young man who protested. I actually have some hope in this, as because of their exposure to propaganda in education, such men are more aware of “Gender” and may well see the hypocrisy. Dr Farrell being an example. The advance of feminism in recent years really reflects the fact that men (and women) have simply left the field open for them, allowing them to take up space as “experts”. If more men took an interest I suspect, like the partner of a prominent current feminist, they will find it hypocritical and “like being shouted at all the time for something I haven’t done”.
Which is why I think it important to highlight obvious “specific problems” such as in education, health, family, housing, suicide. Where the stats. are widely accepted and the politically motivated inaction clear (see Jess laugh)
Even though my “red pill” has to do with DA and there are obvious gross perversions of justice in sexual offences I have to admit in a deeply gynocentric culture men are easily persuaded to white knightery to defend “our girls” over such issues .
I admit to being both ignorant and confused when J4MB took up MGM in a big way. But as a political issue it makes no possible challenge to women, is clearly unethical in the context where for instance one needs to be 18 to get a tattoo and challenges feminists who claim its “about all people” to join in a child protection issue. Their inaction and hostility exposing the hypocrisy constantly.
Rather like PT in Canada younger men have been persuaded feminists are about equality for all. And in fact in conversation I find many presume some of the issues that have received coverage in recent years , education attainment, university, suicide, homelessness (even Domestic Abuse) are being tackled for males as much as females. If they took just a bit more interest they’d soon find that is not the case. The challenge is not to “fight” the feminists head on (they will not change their creed) but undermine their position as sole experts on these issues in the corridors of power. To get more to see the emperor has no clothes.
LikeLike
The Guardian ‘Topics’ links at the bottom of the piece says it all :
Gender
Women
Feminism
news
No mention of Men, Women, but not men
LikeLike
Pleasing that while The Guardian mocks the effort, the paper found it important enough to ridicule.
Worried or what?
LikeLike
Mike can you give us a brief summary of the story here please? I really don’t want to visit the Guardian website and boost their “visitor” statistics.
They will use my click to pretend to themselves and Google that their political views are really popular so they should get more in advertising fees. You can always say you were quoting the article “for the purposes of review” – that usually allows a few illustrative lines to be quoted.
By the way, in a recent piece you said to practice tax avoidance to starve the state of funds (because those funds will inevitably be spent on women at the expense of men). I emphatically agree – would it be worth having a section on your site dedicated to useful practical tips on how we can do this?
Keep fighting.
PCS
LikeLike