
Our thanks to Sue for this. The end of the piece:
Mr Pottinger [prosecutor] added: ‘There was a clear intention to cause more injury than he sustained because there were a number of blows that did not connect with any real force.’
Williams’ lawyer Mr Dan Darnbrough said: ‘She deeply regrets her actions. It will be her first custodial sentence and she is terrified.
‘Sometimes she drank to excess and took cannabis and says her anti-depressant tablets turned her into a zombie.’ [J4MB translation: She can’t be held accountable for her actions because vagina.]
Both women were given a 10-year restraining order against Mr Liddell and forbidden from contacting him by Judge Lamb.
He said: ‘There is no dispute this is a Category One offence.
‘Save for motherhood there’s little in mitigation for these defendants for me to take a different course.’
Could someone please explain to me why these violent women being mothers should be a ‘mitigation’? Wouldn’t their children be better off being looked after by less dysfunctional people?
If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

One might reasonably think that their crimes justified a sentence of twenty eight years and the fostering or adoption of their children, unless their relatives wish to raise them, if that is advisable. I’m probably going ‘too far’ but I would argue that anti-social, if not actually evil, trash like those two should also be sterilised, for the benefit of society and the poor unfortunates they might bring into the world.
LikeLike
Trash like this should have no pathetic excuses to reduce their sentence, the law is an ass
LikeLike