Our thanks to John for this (video, 3:56).

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Just published.

There’s a link to the video (10:50) of Philip Davies’s speech in the House of Commons in relation to the Crime (Aggravated Murder of and Violence Against Women) Bill in a recent blog post, here. Check out the body language of the MPs on the government benches. Along with the few Conservative MPs bothering to turn up for Philip’s debate on International Men’s Day, it tells you all you need to know about their hostility to men’s issues, and genuine gender equality. Philip Davies’s courage is exemplary, and an inspiration to all concerned with the human rights of men and boys.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Sean for this. We clearly need more female pilots, in line with the policy at EasyJet, under its female CEO. Details here.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Krishnan Guru-Murphy recently had the daunting challenge of interviewing for Channel 4 News Ann Coulter, a Trump-supporting American conservative social and political commentator, writer, syndicated columnist, and lawyer. In the unlikely event that these sources of work and income dry up, she could make a fortune advertising hair products for L’Oreal. She’s worth it.

At one point in the interview, Guru-Murthy asked Coulter – with his trademark sneer – if she was a lawyer. Slightly bemused, she replied, ‘Yes’. TV gold, thanks to poor preparation on Guru-Murthy’s part.

The stimulating video (9:55) of the interview – here – sadly lacks the second or two at the end, when Guru-Murphy flung his file onto the desk in exasperation. He’d been so outgunned, I almost felt sorry for the poor man. Almost. I think Coulter’s cheery wave at the end was the final nail in his coffin.

In 20 minutes’ time Channel 4 will be broadcasting a documentary about homeless women in the UK. Well, they constitute about 10% of the total, so it’s only right to focus on them, not the 90%.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

It’s long been known a substantial proportion of sexual abuse of adults and children is carried out by women. In my home town of Bedford there’s currently a poster campaign about child sexual exploitation, featuring pictures of – and statements by – children. Generally, but not always, girls.

The ‘umbrella organisation’ behind the posters is Bedfordshire Against Child Sexual Exploitation, the constituent organizations of which include Bedfordshire Police (female Chief Constable, the force pays Women’s Aid to feed feminist lies about domestic violence to police officers), NSPCC (an organization untroubled by MGM, which is clearly cruelty to children), and various public bodies.

While the language used on pages other than the home page of the website is carefully gender-neutral, the ideological bias of the campaign is clear from the images of children on the posters, as displayed on the home page:

• five large images of abused children (three girls, two boys). In every case the abuser is a man.
• six smaller images of abused children (three girls, three boys). One seems to allude to a female abuser, with ‘She told me she loved me on social media then asked for money’, but how is that child sexual exploitation? If anything it’s child financial exploitation, and how much money does the average child have, anyway? Besides, I haven’t seen that particular strange poster in Bedford.

In 9 of the 11 images the sex abuser is a man, in another one it’s implied, I think.

So, what will a child – of either sex – who’s being sexually abused by one or more women, possibly their own mothers, make of these posters? Quite possibly that only men sexually abuse children, so (s)he won’t be believed. What a cruel implicit message both for those children, and others who will be sexually abused by the large number of women who are not being held properly to account by the police and others.

Ironically, for a poster campaign which misinforms the public about child sexual exploitation, all the posters feature the following message, in large letters:

CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION

THE MORE YOU KNOW, THE MORE YOU SEE

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Well, some women are all those things, and more, aren’t they? Labour MPs among them e.g. Harriet Harman, Jess Phillips, Yvette Balls, Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh, Paula Sherriff…

A tip of the hat to Guido Fawkes for publishing this. Predictably, for Guido’s site, the comments stream is both insightful and hilarious. Enjoy.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

An excellent new piece.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to John for this, from the New York Post. He writes:

“Men need to feel a cold spike of fear when they begin a sexual encounter.”  This is the environment that was created in 2011 on US universities, along with the university kangaroo courts with it, thanks to the feminists in Obama’s administration.

It is also exactly the relationship-destroying environment that Elizabeth Ramey, an American girl who studied at Oxford, tried bringing to the UK when she sued Oxford.  She received financial support from the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission and the End Violence Against Women Campaign, which appear to be typical scare-mongering, post-fact world radical feminists.  Thank goodness Elizabeth Ramey failed in her legal challenge.

UK University men must be on guard and fight back to ensure they don’t end up like their US counterparts.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

In 2013 I penned an article for AVfM, Is there a psychological driver behind feminism?. It covered the issue of female- and male-patterned brains, and their relation to feminism. My conclusion:

In my view, feminism is a movement driven by gender-untypical women who are ‘intermediate’ psychologically, and who demand ever more economic and political power. They’re facilitated by alpha males (e.g. David Cameron) who hand them that power on a plate, regardless of their lack of a democratic mandate to do so, and regardless of the harm caused to society in general. Until and unless we accept this reality, I think we’ll all suffer at the hands of feminist ideologues committed to a delusion, namely that gender-typical men and women – the vast majority – aren’t different psychologically.

I don’t think many people would disagree that women are typically, as a class, more anxious creatures than men. Male anxiety tends to result from real external threats, while female anxiety appears to exist even when external threats are, to all intents and purposes, non-existent (or close to non-existent). Much feminist activity is directed at provoking and sustaining female anxiety, creating a ‘climate of hysteria’, to the material benefit of professional feminist parasites.

‘Epistemol’ left the following comments in response to a recent blog piece:

Some [feminists] may well have mental health issues, I agree, but I once more offer Epistemol’s First Law for your consideration. Women suffer from “the three I’s”,  feelings of –

i. Insecurity
ii. Inadequacy
iii. Inferiority

These, to be fair, are not nice, to say the least, the temptation then being to deal with them in the easiest, not the best, way. Feelings of “the three R’s” –

i. Resentment
ii. Rancour
iii. Revenge

Much of feminism fits into these simple but profound categories.

Each may of course be further divided into almost infinite sub categories, but it’s as good a start as any, and better than most, I feel.

He’s right. We turn to the odious Jess Phillips MP, the winner of a Toxic Feminist of the Month award. Her narcissistic and anti-male maiden speech in the House of Commons – here (video, 6:38) – must surely be a prime contender for the most woeful such speech ever made. She infamously sought to stop Philip Davies having a debate in parliament on International Men’s Day (2015), the video (10:34) of her ultimately unsuccessful effort is here.

Our thanks to Kevin for this lengthy interview of the Yardley Yob, in yesterday’s Guardian. The interviewer is a woman, of course. The first excerpt primarily relates to anxiety:

The one thing Phillips hopes every reader will take from the book is how frightened she feels, all the time. This came as a surprise to me, and probably will to everyone who knows her: people have been marvelling at her apparent fearlessness for as long as she can remember. Female role models who can inspire confidence by example are pretty thin on the ground, so why disillusion her admirers by telling us she’s secretly terrified?

“Because I am.” But how does it help to say so? “So we all know that we all feel it.”

Phillips’ great fear is that women will put her success down to some miracle gift of freakish self-belief, to which they could never aspire. “That’s why they need to know that I’m scared shitless, too, just like them.” Another important theme of her book is the importance of “bigging yourself up”. Men do it all the time, she repeatedly points out, and women have to stop being so squeamish about saying they deserve what they want.

How can Phillips be a well-functioning MP, when she ‘feels frightened, all the time’? She can’t. Yet she’s directly responsible for saying and doing the things that lead to a backlash against her, and hence her anxiety, for example her opposition to the Philip Davies debate. She says, ‘women… deserve what they want’. Wow. What a combination of entitlement and narcissism there is in those few words. Another excerpt, Phillips speaking:

Positive discrimination is a thorny subject. I have made no secret of the fact that I was selected on an all-women shortlist. [She couldn’t have made it a secret, it was public knowledge. The best she could hope for was to seek to justify it. Here goes.]

People often use this to assert that I was not the best person for the job, merely the best woman. I wonder if Jessica Ennis-Hill was ever told this? “Er, sorry, Jess, your Olympic gold medal isn’t a real one, because you only competed against other women. Instead, we’ve given you this medal we call girlie gold.”

What a mind-numbingly stupid analogy, even by Phillips’s rock-bottom standards. Jessica Ennis-Hill was competing in a women’s sport. Phillips isn’t an MP in a female parliament , although parliament is deeply gynocentric. The end of the piece:

At the very same Labour conference where Corbyn was adorned with young, ethnically diverse women, I sat in a very cold hotel room with him and told him that I was willing to do all I could to make him look good. I was willing to organise events for women and roll him out. I was willing to help boost his feminist credentials. [my emphasis] But only if he guaranteed me a 50/50 cabinet, with women represented equally in every stratum of his shadow ministerial team. I told him I would look out for areas where he was going wrong and try to get in front of them, rather than criticising the howling, sexist gaffes afterwards. I made a promise to help him with his image, but I bloody well demanded he did stuff for Labour women, too. If he does, I will sing his praises. If he doesn’t, I shall make sure everybody knows it. [My emphasis. What a nasty, manipulative, bullying woman she is. It’s little wonder the Labour party is increasingly being referred to as the Labour party, and in opinion polls trails some 12 – 15 percentage points behind the Conservatives.]

In a world where how you appear matters so much, we women have got to wake up to the fact that they need us more than we need them. We must sweat our assets; let’s go full-on Tyra Banks and get finger-snapping demanding.

Jeremy agreed, and so far so good. [my emphasis] We have found a way to work together, to set up events to help women get involved, stand as mayors or local candidates. We have got to a place that, if it’s about women, they give me a call. We are getting there, slowly but surely.

We can but hope that the voters – especially the male voters – of Birmingham Yardley will give this sexist harpie the swift boot up the a*** she so richly deserves, on 7 May, 2020.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to William for this. An extract:

The plan has been signed off by Defence Secretary Michael Fallon and Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Nick Carter.

They hope the trial will appeal to female personnel [my emphasis] who consider military life with its rigid hours and lengthy overseas commitments to be entirely incompatible with raising a family. [S0 why did they join up in the first place?]

A Ministry of Defence spokesman said last night: ‘This pilot is part of a modern offer to help Britain’s world-class Armed Forces keep the broadest range of people and give them and their families the broadest service opportunities.’

You don’t have to be a genius to realise that ensuring (a) military effectiveneness and efficiency, and (b) the provision of part-time work for female soldiers, are incompatible objectives – and male unemployment has long been higher than female unemployment. Is there no limit to the harm to state institutions (and employable young men) that will be tolerated in pursuit of the goal of generating part-time work for women? Seemingly not.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.