Is Kate Smurfwit a tad racist?

/ Mike Buchanan

Our thanks to John for this.

TRIGGER WARNING: at the end of the piece there’s a link to a video (2:00) in which the Smufwit disrobes to reveal a strap-on semi-erect black dildo.

To my mind, anyone who finds the video – or anything Smurfwit says, or does – funny, must be a hatchet-faced feminist, or have mental health issues… but I’m repeating myself. It’s little wonder BBC feminazis gives her so much exposure.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

5 thoughts on “Is Kate Smurfwit a tad racist?”

  2. I can’t imagine this dreary bitch being able to make a living from her ‘comedy’ if it weren’t for the ideologues of the BBC adopting her like some mangy old stray and then inflicting her on their long suffering viewers and listeners.
    Remember how her gig at Goldsmiths was cancelled last year? She tried to claim that she had been ‘no platformed’ because of her ‘controversial’ views. Fact is that she had only sold 8 tickets.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/society/11386478/Kate-Smurthwaite-the-comedian-who-confused-no-interest-with-no-platform.html

    Like

    Reply

  3. What I find unbelivable about Political Correctness is that it is so far from being correct in anyway.
    Having put myself through the uncofortable experience of watching this disgruntled woman’s attempt ttemp

    Like

    Reply

  4. What I find unbelievable about Political Correctness is that it is so very far from being correct.

    Any attempt at controlling and editting human speech and behaviour (in order to render it inoffensive and ‘officially approved’) is bound to fail because until words or actions have been expressed it is not possible to assess their theoretic suitability.
    And as the rulebook of political correctness is subjective, depending entirely on the interpretation of the offended party, there can never be a definitive guideline to follow. We all know that.

    In the same way, the national speed limit can only be applied on the grounds that the speed limit is clearly defined as, for example, 40mph. If you drive at 45mph you are breaking the speed limit. Simple. The sign at the side of the road does not say “No driving too fast or else!” because my definition of too fast may not be yours.

    Which brings me to Hateful Smurfmeister’s attempt at comedy, linked above…

    Having put myself through the uncomfortable experience of watching this display of humourless attention seeking I couldn’t help considering the hypocrisy of the process. This ‘act’ apparently passes feminist codes of Political Correctness on the grounds that.. what?..it is ‘satire’ or something? It is clear that if an untalented and juvenile attention-seeking bloke got up on stage and strapped a rubber vagina to himself in order to ridicule females, he would be renounced by the Politically Correct Social Facists as offensive, purile, hateful, and unacceptable.
    Can these people not see this? – Of course they can, but their cause is not one of fairness or humour.

    The clip reminded me Christopher Hitchens’ statement about men, women, and comedy. He said that men can do comedy (generally) because it’s part of their necessary repertoire for attracting a mate. And women can’t do comedy (generally) because men find them attractive enough as they are… As females their methods of attracting a mate are different.

    As the Smurfmeister shows here the rule is generally true. Her performance is neither humourous or attractive because her aim is not actually to make people laugh by entertaining them. Her intention is actually to publicly demonstrate and encourage hostility towards a selected social target group for political ends. This is not comedy.
    It’s a misandrist’s warcry.
    And I cant help but think that she’s actually getting a thrill out of the piece of kit attached to her waist, for all her attempts at ridiculing the masculine. 🙂

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment