There’s a good reason we screen comments in advance on our blogs, and on our YouTube channel. In the early days, before we carried out such screening, feminists wasted our time by posting comments containing one or more of the following:

• conspiracy theories
• fantasies
• lies
• delusions
• myths

There weren’t the hours in the day to deal with the derailing that resulted, so we introduced screening, and saved ourselves a great deal of time. Feminists – not the fastest of learners, obviously – eventually learned there was no point in submitting feminist views, because we wouldn’t publish them (unless they were particularly ludicrous or hilarious).

Other bloggers take a different approach. Ally Fogg doesn’t screen comments in advance, and while he clearly doesn’t welcome my comments, he doesn’t remove them.

Glen Poole takes a third approach, historical revisionism, as favoured by Guardian moderators – I’m told all comments which mention MGM in response to Guardian articles are removed very swiftly – reminiscent of Winston Smith’s work in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949).

Poole removes unwanted comments – or at least unwanted comments from me, if his actions this evening are anything to go by. Most of the comments following his latest piece on InsideMAN have been deeply critical of the thesis he put forward in the piece. He’s removed all my comments, but I took a screensave of three of them within the comments stream, here. If Poole had left them in place, I should have had no need to write this piece. I return to my point about feminists wasting our time.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Cassie in fine form (video, 15:58). It was good to hear her mention MGM, albeit fleetingly, at 6:18.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Another woeful piece by Glen Poole, a prominent mangina currently resident in Australia, for his website InsideMAN. Along with other feminist commentators such as Ally Fogg, he appears not to understand the implications of the declining public support for feminism, and the increasing public support for anti-feminism. Poole, Fogg, and their like, are on the wrong side of history.

Pleasingly, however, Poole has included a video clip of some comments I made during the Q&A session after the recent screening of The Red Pill in London, and even relates some of my comments, although he cannot bring himself to identify me by name. He describes me simply as an ‘anti-feminist’, a badge I wear with pride. The comments he includes:

Feminism cannot be negotiated with, it’s a female supremacy movement driven by the hatred of men and to me the idea that you can negotiate with feminists or that feminists will cede power to men and boys… it’s as fanastic (sic) as Jews in the Second World War thinking the Nazis would help them.

I stand by every word.

Initial responses to the piece by ‘AJ’ and ‘Taca’ are excellent, I urge you to add your own comments.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Jeff for this, posted in December 2013. An extract:

Meanwhile feminism has been teaching girls and women that they deserve to have it all. That if they are not blissfully happy then they should bail out; that they should never have to compromise in any way to attract or keep a man; that it is men who should make all the compromises. When a man makes the decision to opt out of this one-sided deal, it is, we are told, because he is selfish or immature; he cannot “man up”. He is a “manchild”. Many men are simply walking away. Many are avoiding the toxic, over-entitled, parasitical products of decades of feminism altogether and looking for suitable matches overseas. Women are left wondering “where have all the good men gone?”

Well the answer dear, is that they have run away from you because you see, a man wants a partner. He wants a lover, companion, friend and comrade and he wants that partner to be female. He doesn’t want some gender-neutral humanoid, and he certainly doesn’t want some whiny, judgmental entitlement princess who will take him to the cleaners at the first sign of trouble.

I’ve rarely read a more insightful justification for MGTOW.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Great news. As we saw with the crowdfunder for The Red Pill, we’re now in an era when enough people are prepared to donate what they can, to fund important film projects on men’s issues.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Enjoy (video, 2:02).

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Ann Widdecombe (69), a former Conservative MP, on fine form on BBC Radio 4 last Saturday (7:00). The piece starts with a clip from an episode of Yes Minister broadcast in 1982, three years after Margaret Thatcher became the country’s first female prime minister.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

An excellent review on the Backbencher website.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Dan Hodges is a journalist, blogger and columnist. He describes himself as a ‘tribal neo-Blairite’. His mother is the former Labour MP Glenda Jackson, currently playing King Lear in some whackadoodle feminist producer’s desecration of Shakespeare’s play.

Hodges has a full-page in the The Mail on Sunday, and last Sunday he wrote this:

An attempt by Tory MP Philip Davies last week to secure the support of the Commons for International Men’s Day did not go to plan. The sparsely attended debate saw Davies facing criticism from a number of female MPs. [Clarification – FEMINIST MPs] But some of the harshest barbs came from male members of Parliament.

‘Being a man is all about quiet strength,’ one of Davies’s colleagues told me. ‘It’s not about moaning in the chamber.

Time to man up, Philip.

To the best of my knowledge, not one mainstream media outlet issued sympathetic pieces in relation to IMD, other than pieces by Martin Daubney and Glen Poole, promoting their ‘Men and Boys Coalition’.

It is a feature of feminists – female and male – to claim there’s a problem with ‘toxic masculinity’, that if men were to talk more about their problems, their lives would improve, suicide rates would drop etc. It’s nonsense, and a direct attack on stoicism, a fine male quality which deters men from suicide, rather than drives them to it. Predictably it’s an argument made by The Calm Initiative, run by Jane Powell, a particularly odious radical feminist.

Ironically, whilst displaying no empathy themselves for the suffering of men and boys – no prominent feminist in the modern era has called for an end to MGM, which would cost women nothing – feminists fail to recognize the extent of the empathy gap. The lack of mainstream media coverage of International Men’s Day is one indicator, as is Dan Hodges’s exhortation to Philip Davies to ‘man up’ – in effect, to ‘shut up’.

I presume Hodges made up the alleged quotation from ‘one of Davies’s colleagues’, and he doesn’t enlighten us as to precisely how Davies might display ‘quiet strength’ in raising awareness of the suffering of men and boys. He should be utterly ashamed of himself.  

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Nailed.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.