Our thanks to Mike P for this.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Tom for this short but insightful article by the estimable Philip Davies MP.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

I am delighted to announce that – thanks to the generosity of a number of British MRAs – The Red Pill will be screened in Cambridge on the evening of Saturday, 3 December, and tickets are free. There are only 120 tickets in total, and a few have already gone, so you’ll need to book your tickets soon, here.

Along with a few other MRAs, I’ll be staying on to answer questions. I look forward to meeting some new faces. There’s a growing number of MRAs in the Cambridge area, and it’s about time students at the University learned the truth about men’s issues, and learned about the state’s assaults on the human rights of men and boys, most of them at the behest of feminists driven by misandry.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Gary Costanza of A Voice for Men for a piece he’s titled Northwood United Synagogue’s mohelim – are THEY the mutilators, OR YOU?.

One of the Known Genital Mutilators is Dr Martin Harris, outside whose Golders Green clinic we protested some months ago, and will again, shortly.

The word ‘mohelim’ is the plural of mohel, a Jew trained in Brit milah. An alternative ceremony, which does not include the mutilation of 8-day-old baby boys’ genitals, is Brit shalom. A two-sided leaflet produced by ‘Jews Against Circumcision’, is Brit Shalom: A Peaceful Alternative.

Because Male Genital Mutilation is undoubtedly illegal in the UK, the 32 mohelim registered with the Northwood United Synagogue are, equally undoubtedly, criminals.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

A tip of the hat to Kathy Gyngell of The Conservative Woman for her contribution to this (video, 19:20), broadcast last Sunday.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

On behalf of Campaign for Merit in Business I recently sent a written submission to the DBIS inquiry on corporate governance, and I have yet to learn if I’m going to be asked to give oral evidence, as I did to a previous inquiry in 2012. I hope so, as I believe I’d be the only person to point out that the entire ‘business case’ for higher female representation on boards is based upon the false premise that appointing more women to boards will lead to enhanced financial performance, while the evidence clearly demonstrates a causal link with corporate performance decline.

But that doesn’t stop the proponents of ‘more women on boards’ from relentlessly lying (or implying) a business case exists. The list of written submissions to the DBIS inquiry is here. One is from the odious 30% club, which cites a number of studies and reports in support of their contention that more women on boards leads to improved corporate performance. The most recent is from the Credit Suisse Research Institute, September 2016, the 51-page-long mind-numbing The CS Gender 3000: The Reward for Change. The second page starts with this:

Gender diversity is an important element of corporate performance and talent management efforts. In its second, updated report the Credit Suisse Research Institute reconfirms the clear link [my emphasis] between diversity and improved business performance.

The begged question, of course, is whether the clear link is a causal link, or meaningless correlation.

On p.25 a section starts, with the title, ‘Does greater female participation make for greater impact?’ We find this in the second paragraph on p.27:

Lower leverage, higher payouts and higher return on capital employed lend support to the idea that diversity implies better returns for lower risk. In addition, our HOLT analysis shows that companies with a number of female top managers hold meaningfully lower excess cash on their balance sheets. Figure 29 again shows a linear relationship as we see for the dividend payout ratio, 15% lower for companies with 25% women, 18% for those with 33% and 26% for those with 50%. While we still do not argue causality, [my emphasis] there is a consistency in our findings that demonstrates that greater gender diversity at senior levels leads to [my emphasis] greater returns for a company…

In the course of a single sentence, the report doesn’t ‘argue causality’, then goes on to… er… argue causality. It’s enough to drive a man mad…

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Martin for this. White women were a key demographic, 37% of voters. 53% of them voted for Trump, 43% for Clinton.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Sean for this gem (video, 5:39) by Gary Orsum, an Australian.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

You couldn’t make it up. Our thanks to Martin for the link.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

An interesting piece from Mr Purdy. He’s more optimistic than myself about the potential impact of the Trump victory on feminism, but I hope he’s proven right in due course. Maybe for the first time we saw the emergence of a clear “men’s vote” at this election, and the political classes will have to find a way to engage in future with issues disproportionately affecting men and boys, of which there are so many. That can only be a good thing.

The BBC is, of course, in denial about the election result, as it was about the Brexit referendum result. That said, BBC News 24 has treated us to a series of interviews with whiny hatchet-faced American feminists. Television doesn’t get much better. About an hour ago Hitlary made a speech in which she focused again on women and girls, and blamed ‘the glass ceiling’ for her defeat.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.