There was an interesting discussion (17:08) on Sunday Morning Live this morning, over whether statutory maternity leave (maximum 12 months) is too long. The episode is here, and will be available for 29 days. The relevant section is 21:09 – 38:17.

The BBC’s customary gender and ideological stance was in evidence. The interviewer was female, Laura Perrins (co-editor, The Conservative Woman) was the only one speaking sense whilst being opposed by three feminists (two female, one male). She put in a great performance, as we’d expect from the woman who slayed three feminists on Woman Sour four months ago – here (audio, 14:45).

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

It’s always a particular joy to read of Special Snowflake being criticised publicly by women, as here. A tip of the hat to Kathy Gyngell.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Chloe for this. The reason Bindel wants to deter alleged rape victims from seeking legal redress is obvious. It will make those women angry at ‘the system’, and angry at men and therefore hateful towards them, making them ready recruits to her evil ideology, and supporters of professional feminists such as herself.

Chloe writes:

Similar fact evidence, which this was, is very rarely admitted in a criminal trial. The similarities must be so obvious and so striking as to have a probative value of themselves , as they did in this case. I have put this in a reader comment which I very much doubt will be published.

Nor should Mr Evans be expected to apologise to this very dangerous young woman, and those feminists who expect him to do so are totally deluded. Nor should her father be rushing to her defence.

The reality is that predators like this – and they can be both male and female, as witness “Nick” who made allegations against MacAlpine and others – should be named and identified as a way of managing the risk they pose. They are as dangerous as child molesters, who can now be identified to the communities in which they propose to live.

If I was to give one piece of advice to this young woman, it would be to totally abstain from alcohol for the rest of her life. Because of her uncontrolled behaviour while under the influence one man has spent two years in prison and lost a lucrative career. One hopes she will reflect on this, but as a member of Generation Snowflake all she is doing is whining at the behaviour of the Internet users who have found her out.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

From time to time I receive letters from men incarcerated in British prisons, and I always respond to them. Most claim to be the victims of false rape allegations. One such man recently wrote to me for the first time, strongly supporting our stance in this area, and said J4MB had been mentioned briefly in Converse, which claims to be ‘the highest circulation national prisons newspaper’.

I couldn’t find the article online, so I asked him if he could send me the cutting, and he did – here. It followed the media fuss – mainly in The Guardian, what are the chances? – over Philip Davies MP speaking at the second International Conference on Men’s Issues. Philip spoke about the justice gender gap, a video (44:48) of his talk is here.

The piece referred to our website featuring a piece by Janet Bloomfield (‘JudgyBitch’), published in December 2014, 13 reasons women lie about being raped. We’re surprised it didn’t also refer to our website featuring Hannah Wallen’s Six dangerous rape myths or Jonathan Taylor’s Ten reasons false rape allegations are common.

The latest letter, which accompanied the cutting:

Dear Mike,

Thank you for your swift reply and your concern about my present situation.

I have attached the cutting which I took from Converse, sorry that it is marked but it is difficult to keep things in a pristine condition in here.

You have my deepest admiration for your efforts to put men back on a level playing field and for exposing the women who are making false claims which have resulted in so many of us being convicted and losing our freedom.

The legislation which allows allegations to be considered ‘evidence’ should be revoked because all convictions should require proof, not hearsay!

While I appreciate your understanding of my financial situation (I had politely declined his generous offer of regular donations from his very small prison earnings) I still wish to support your cause as much as I possibly can and I would like to make a donation in the future.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Very good.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Jeff for this. Vera Baird QC is a particularly odious hatchet-faced radical feminist, similar to Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions. In January Baird won our Toxic Feminist of the Month award, in February Saunders won it.

The jury in Ched Evans’s appeal (most of whom were women) heard from men who testified that not long before the encounter with Ched Evans, and not long after, the woman had enjoyed sex with them, whilst drunk. Had this information been available at the first trial, it’s likely Ched Evans would not have been convicted. At the appeal, the jury reached a unanimous verdict.

Given that the driving force for women such as Baird and Saunders is to see men convicted of rape, whatever it takes, we shouldn’t be surprised to learn that Baird would have liked to see Evans convicted for a second time. These women have no sense of justice when it comes to men, who are innocent until proven guilty… except juries keep acquitting innocent men, which explains why Julie Bindel is pressing for an end to juries in rape trials.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Following the welcome acquittal of Ched Evans, we’ve had an increase of hits on this (video, 17:26), an extract from an episode of Question Time in January 2015. Ched Evans, then recently released from prison after serving two and a half years of a five year prison sentence, had been seeking to return to professional football. This is an extract from my original description:

I was interested to watch her (Julia Hartley-Brewer’s) contribution to last Thursday’s Question Time, in which a lady in the audience asked the following question:

“After serving his sentence for rape, should footballer Ched Evans be given a chance to continue with his career?”

To my mind, Julia’s response was the only one from any of the five panelists which demonstrated intellect, fair-mindedness, and compassion.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

More nonsense from Special Snowflake. The end of the piece, in which the woman (not Ched Evans) is inevitably the victim, is this:

It is important to acknowledge that Ched Evans has been found not-guilty. But there is nothing to celebrate here.

I’m sick to death of the feminist narrative – used by SS (a FemiNazi) in her piece – that few rape allegations are false. For us to know how many are false would require women who make false allegations to be truthful and own up, when they have no incentive to do so. Indeed their incentive is to stick with their story, regardless of the damage done to men.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Steven for this. Key extracts:

The boy suffered from various medical problems including severe epilepsy. He wore a padded helmet and had special needs. He was unable to communicate.

The 57-year-old woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, became his foster carer because his parents were unable to look after him.

During the incident in January 2014, the witness saw the woman slap the child on both sides of the face with her palm and the back of her hand.

She also took hold of the helmet, pulled his head back and forced food into his mouth with her fingers.

“He saw this sequence several times,” said prosecutor Helen McCormack. “He was shocked by what he saw.”

The woman denied cruelty to a child, but was convicted in August…

Recorder David Jeremy QC told her: “Your reaction to treating a vulnerable child in this way was to lie throughout. You refused to accept the jury’s verdict despite clear and overwhelming evidence.

“You have chosen to hide away in a state of delusional denial. I have no doubt you present a continuing risk to anyone who opposes you.”

The judge was given an assurance that the woman would not be allowed to foster any other children.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Predictable. The judges really must start presenting Nobel Prizes on the grounds of sex rather than merit. And white sprinters in Olympics 100 metres sprint competitions must be given a head start – 10 metres should suffice – so they can ‘compete’ with black sprinters.

Prejudice against white sprinters has gone on for far too long, and cannot be accepted any longer. This is 2016.

10 metres ahead of white male sprinters we can have black female sprinters, and 10 metres ahead of them, white female sprinters. 10 metres ahead of them, obese sprinters (any gender or colour), and 10 metres ahead of them, heavy smokers with hacking coughs. Everyone should then have an equal chance of ‘winning’. Equality is a fine thing.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.