Our thanks to Jordan for this, a short piece by Martin Daubney. It includes a link to an Eventbrite ticket booking page for the screening of The Red Pill in London at 2pm on International Men’s Day, 19 November. I’ve just bought a ticket and look forward to watching the film after the fathers’ rights march from the Royal Courts of Justice to Parliament Square.

Erin Pizzey will be hosting the Q&A, and director Cassie Jaye hopes to fly over to London for the event. 47 of the 120 tickets (£11.21) have already been sold, so if you want to attend, you’d be well advised to book your ticket NOW. They won’t be available for much longer, that’s for sure.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Kevin for pointing us to a Time magazine piece titled Hillary Clinton’s Emailgate Is an Attack on Women. To feminists, a man criticising a woman, holding her publicly accountable for her actions and inactions, is an attack on all women. To normal people, this position is ridiculous. So when I say Professor Robin Lakoff is a blithering idiot – there are countless feminist idiots in academia, of course, mainly funded by male taxpayers – I confine the point only to her, and her stupid article.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

I’ve received an email from an American, who has given me clearance to publish it in full, along with names. We have not edited the piece. He is seeking donations to help fund a legal appeal, you can find a link to his website at the end of his message.

My name is Andrew L Goss. I have been married almost 20 years to the same woman. We have 8 children together. She has been verbally and physically abusive for at least the last decade or so.

In 2009, she was arrested for trying to stab me to death in front of our minor children. She was given a 1 year probation and ordered to undergo anger management. She was kept out of the home for a year due to a restrictive protection order. After roughly 1 year, I allowed her back in the home because she appeared to have changed quite a bit as a result of her anger-management classes and the shock of losing her family.

The change was short-lived.

In 2015, she was arrested again for felony enhanced domestic violence. Again she was removed from the home due to a protective order. I have had primary custody of the kids since 03.10.2015. I filed for divorce. We just had a custody hearing in front of Judge Larry Noll in San Antonio, TX. Judge Noll only allowed 30 minutes for each side to make their arguments, in a case that involved 8 children, 20 years of married, and two felony domestic violence arrests.

On October 21, 2016, in the middle of Domestic Violence Awareness month, Judge Noll had the audacity to rule that, as a man, I could not possibly had a fear of my wife, therefore I could not possibly have been a victim of domestic violence. Judge Noll ruled that the children be yanked away from the stable environment that I have provided for them, and be given to their violent and abusive mother.

I am not a weak punk. I was simply raised that it was not right to hit a woman, so I didn’t. I did what the government told me. I did what my schools told me. I did what my mother told me. At the end of the day, Judge Larry Noll basically said that women have a right to abuse men, and men have no legal complaint when they do.

This may sound made up, but it is not. You can verify everything that I have said. I have posted public records at Judge Larry Noll Rules That Men Cannot Be Victims of Domestic Violence.

Andrew L Goss

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Serco is a major British outsourcing company, with an annual turnover of £3.1 billion, and 100,000+ employees, mostly in the UK.

Our thanks to a supporter, Dave, for sending us this. It’s the short multiple-choice quiz Serco uses as part of the employment process. Question 2 is this:

What is the average percentage less that female workers are paid compared to males working exactly the same position? [my emphasis]

– 8%
– 13%
– 17%

The correct answer, 0%, is of course not available. Human Remains has long been a female-dominated field, and we shouldn’t be surprised to see feminist ideology play a part in the recruitment process – though it’s rarely so overt. I think we can guess how a man who wrote in ‘0%’ would fare thereafter with his job application.

The best article we know about in connection with the gender pay gap is William Collins’s, here. The positive pay gap for women in their 20s has increased since he wrote the piece.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Our thanks to Tom for this (video, 5:06). The hatchet-faced feminist first opens her mouth at 2:21.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Wonderful news. The campaign has been stopped at USD12,670, which should meet the anticipated legal costs. My thanks again to all those who joined us in supporting this.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

I could write at considerable length about why I think 8 Out of 10 Cats Does Countdown is the funniest panel show ever broadcast on television, but I won’t. Seeing is believing, so I invite you to watch this, an episode just broadcast on Channel 4. A much-loved female relative who lives in Ireland is a huge fan of Irish comic genius David O’Doherty, as I am, and if you want to know why, catch his piece on Shakira (21:45 – 24:24). Enjoy.

Our thanks to Hannah for tweeting a link to this. The start of the piece:

The student from Texas A&M University, Miranda Rader, also had an open bottle of wine in a cup holder next to her, the Bryan Police Department said.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

Have I Got News For You is a topical panel show which has been broadcast on BBC TV since 1990, 26 years ago. The team captains (with the odd break or two) have been the insufferably self-satisfied Ian Hislop, and Paul Merton, a once-talented comedian who seems ever more embarrassed with each show, presumably at how much money he’s earning in return for so little effort.

To say the programme is tired would be an understatement. Almost all BBC comedy is dead, or dying, because of the influence of feminists at the state broadcaster. Sandi Toxic is currently killing QI, only hatchet-faced BBC feminazis could ever have imagined she could replace Stephen Fry. BBC feminist executives and feminist ‘comedians’ are parasites, one and all.

I very seldom watch Have I Got News For You these days, but I watched tonight’s episode. The token female ‘comedian’ was a New Zealander, Rose Matafeo. If you can find even one significant contribution from her (humorous or otherwise) over the 30 minutes, please submit a comment saying what it was, and the time segment.

Thousands of British comedians could (and would) have made stronger contributions to the show, given the chance. Frankly, a Savoy cabbage would have contributed more comedic content than Ms Matafeo, and cost licence fee payers a great deal less.

BBC licence fee payers deserve better than this.

Since the launch of Campaign for Merit in Business in early 2012, and the launch of J4MB in early 2013, our repeated attempts (and those of others interested in men’s and boys’ human rights) to engage with politicians, including government ministers, as well as government departments, have proven fruitless, other than to alert our followers and others to the extent to which the state has no interest in men’s and boys’ human rights, other than to assault them, usually to privilege women and girls.

We cannot think of one area in which individuals or organizations have had any success in rolling back the state’s anti-male assaults, or privileging of females.

When we’ve formally engaged with government, such as giving oral evidence to a House of Commons inquiry on ‘Women in the Workplace’ in 2012 – video (56:49) here – our factual evidence has been ignored, or rejected without explanation. This simply reinforces our conviction that we must make as large an impact as possible ‘on the ground’, and just before Xmas I’ll be starting three and a half years of campaigning in Theresa May’s constituency, Maidenhead, in preparation for the May 2020 general election.

We keep devoting time and effort to attempting engagement, because we’re building up an ever-growing database of evidence of the government’s hostility towards men’s and boys’ human rights. An example happened today.

Last Monday – four days ago – I mailed a letter to Bob Neill MP (C, Bromley & Chislehurst), who’s the Chairman of the Justice Committee. He’s also a barrister – who could be in a better position to engage with the point about MGM being illegal? His short dismissive response is here. The key extract:

You claim the practice is unlawful, but I am neither a judge nor a legal adviser and cannot comment on correct interpretation of the law.

This is remarkable. The ‘correct interpretation of the law’ would be obvious to a first-year law student. MGM is illegal under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and (I am reliably informed) earlier Common Law. So, is Bob Neill MP, Chair, Justice Committee:

(a) unaware of the legal position, or

(b) unaware and unwilling to find out, or

(c) aware, but refuses to admit it?

I cannot think of other alternatives, please send a comment if you can. All the alternatives show him in a poor light, in increasing degrees of seriousness. There is certainly not the slightest sign of concern about the mutilation of male minors’ genitals.

In my letter I wrote of our protests in Luton, Golders Green, and elsewhere, and:

We are prepared to risk violence and even death in pursuit of an end to MGM in the UK.

Any right-minded reader would surely interpret the statement as meaning that protestors, not those who oppose us, will be at risk of violence and even death. Yet Bob Neill disingenuously replied to the point with the following, uses it as part of his reason for declining a meeting:

I note with great concern your willingness ‘to risk violence and even death in pursuit of an end to MGM in the UK’. I hope this is merely an accident of language, but such expressions could be interpreted as threatening: I urge you to take greater care in how you convey your position.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.