British men pay 72% of the income tax collected in the UK, women only 28%. So why does the state relentlessly assault men and boys, whilst advantaging women and girls?

Our public consultation document (link below) is the precursor to our 2015 general election manifesto. Details are provided of 20 areas in which the state assaults men and boys, and proposals are made with respect to each of them. We expect the manifesto will cover more than 20 areas. There are no areas in which the British state assaults women and girls – to the contrary, it preferences them in many ways, to the detriment of men and boys… and the majority of women and girls too, ironically. The state’s deliberate destruction of the nuclear family for 40+ years is but one example.

http://atomic-temporary-215937230.wpcomstaging.com/our-public-consultation-exercise-2/

Last year we sent a FoI request to HMRC enquiring about the gender balance of income tax receipts. We learned that British men collectively pay 72% of the income tax collected in the UK, women just 28%. My article on the matter – ‘He who pays the piper, calls the tune. Or does he?’ – was published by an American website,  ‘A Voice for Men’, http://avoiceformen.com, the most-visited and most influential men’s human rights advocacy website in the world. After you open the following link, scroll down to the article published on 12 March 2o13. Be sure not to have a hot drink in your hand, because there’s a photograph of Janet Street-Porter – who won one of our coveted ‘Harpy’ awards – above an article exploring whether she’s the most evil woman in Britain. A supporter emailed us enquiring, ‘Has Harriet Harman died, then?’

http://www.avoiceformen.com/author/mikebuchanan1957/

Teresa Hughes, 39, almost ruined a primary school’s headmaster’s life, almost received a suspended sentence

We shouldn’t be surprised that so many vile British women make false sex-related allegations against men. The justice system encourages them to do so.

The latest in a long line of cases where mind-boggling leniency is shown to such women, regardless of the damage they’ve tried to wreak on men’s lives and careers. The primary school headmaster in this case likened the experience to having been diagnosed with cancer:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2593508/Mother-launched-hate-campaign-against-primary-school-headteacher-spread-fake-rumours-claiming-sexually-abused-daughter-walks-free.html

Men have committed suicide in response to such false allegations. The woman in this case, as in countless others, didn’t even receive a suspended sentence! Effectively the (male) magistrate was telling the 39-year-old woman:

You’re a very naughty girl. If you do anything like this again, you might receive a punishment. Now let this be a lesson for you. Off you go, dear!

 

The taxpayer supports Sophi Tranchell, but not male victims of domestic violence

Last year we sent a FoI request to HMRC, which resulted in the revelation that British men collectively pay 72% of the income tax collected in the UK, and women only 28%. I wrote an article for AVfM titled, ‘He who pays the piper, calls the tune. Or does he?’:

He who pays the piper, calls the tune. Or does he?

90% of homeless people are men – in part because so much social housing is taken up by women choosing to be single mothers, who then keep their accommodation for life – and government support for homeless people is woeful. Government support for male victims of domestic violence is close to non-existent. So who does the government deem worthy of support from taxpayers? Women such as Sophi Trenchall, the Managing Director of Divine Chocolate. A supporter cut the following out of a downmarket newspaper last Sunday:

140401 Sophi Tranchell

Not only does the government use taxpayers’ money to help a woman sell more of her company’s chocolates abroad, it then uses yet more of their money to pay a trashy newspaper to advertise the fact, presumably to send the subliminal message to its readers that the government is supportive of women.

 

Model who had breast implants on the NHS to get £2,500 dentistry work… paid for by the taxpayer

There’s never been a shortage of young women willing to take their clothes off and be photographed for money, and there never will be. Plenty of attention and money for minimal effort, which appeals to women.

There was understandable outrage a few months ago when a plain-looking woman who wanted to be a glamour model received breast enhancement surgery on the NHS. It now turns out that she later became a prostitute and became pregnant, but doesn’t know who the father is – it’s apparently either a client or a friend. For some bizarre reason pregnant women are entitled to a lot of free dental work on the NHS, hence this:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2593913/Model-breast-implants-NHS-2-5k-teeth-paid-taxpayer.html#ixzz2xcKM6aRn