Caroline Spelman MP drives me to despair, Laura Bates drives me to drink

Two days ago Andrew Grimson, a contributing editor to ConservativeHome, wrote a piece advocating for the Conservative party to introduce all-women prospective parliamentary candidate (‘PPC’) shortlists in order to drive up the number of women MPs. The proposal met with almost universal hostility, as you can see from the comments stream:

http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2014/02/the-tory-case-for-all-women-shortlists.html

When I worked for the Conservative party (2006-8) one of the party’s most respected female MPs was Caroline Spelman. She entered parliament in 1997 and was chairman of the party during the latter stages of my term at CCHQ. To my utter despair, she’s now calling for consideration to be given to the introduction of all-women PPC shortlists, as she outlined during an interview on BBC radio news yesterday (link below). At one point she stated that during the time she was chairman of the party, ten times more women than men applied to become PPCs. In relation to the number of women who apply to be PPCs, women are already wildly over-represented on the Conservative benches. The piece (44:21 – 49:48) will be available online until 6pm on 20 February:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03tt7l9/PM_13_02_2014/

After Spelman’s interview Eddie Mair presented a piece (49:49 – 55:57) addressing the question, ‘How should the cosmetic surgery industry be regulated?’ His first interviewee was the president of the British Association of Plastic Surgeons (‘BAPS’, appropriately) but the second was the inaugural winner of our ‘Whiny Woman of the Month’ award, Laura Bates of The Everyday Whining Project. I had the misfortune to share a studio with Bates when we were interviewed on BBC radio, The Jeremy Vine Show, on 8 March 2013:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKhX1c3ow6BrzdzP3ydpeZQ/videos

Bates is a professional whine collector, and inspired the formation of The Whine Club https://j4mbdotorgdotuk.wordpress.com/the-whine-club/. She was the inaugural winner of our ‘Whiny Woman of the Month’ award (link below) and we expect her to remain a member of The Whine Club for life. Membership can only be cancelled when a woman makes a public commitment to stop whining.

131126 Laura Bates’s ‘Whiny Woman of the Month’ award certificate

Bates’s argument yesterday was that ‘the system’ forces women to be unhappy with their appearance, and ‘the system should be changed’. The average fruit bat is an intellectual giant in comparison with Ms Bates.

Laura Bates is a textbook example of a woman suffering from WPD (Whiny Personality Disorder). Psychologists are divided on the cause of WPD. Some see it as having a genetic component, because sufferers are often the daughters of whiny mothers (especially whiny single mothers). Some psychologists believe the disorder is the natural consequence of women having been whiny girls who found that whining was the secret to getting what they wanted. Whiny girls become whiny adolescents in time, and then whiny women. There’s no known cure, but there are strategies that can be adopted when confronted with sufferers of WPD. Walking sufficiently far away from them that they become inaudible is my own preferred strategy. Maybe if Laura Bates’s parents had said when she was a little girl, ‘Laura, NO. Now stop whining, dear!’, and stuck with this sensible approach, we’d all have been spared much suffering.

I rarely drink alcohol during the week, but listening to Laura Bates always has me reaching for the Highland Park. After a couple of stiff drams in quick succession, I slowly recovered the will to live.

6 February 2014: ‘Question Time’ discussions on anonymity for men charged with sexual assaults, and all-women prospective parliamentary candidate shortlists

Last Thursday’s Question Time was more interesting than usual, mainly due to the inclusion on the panel of the historian and broadcaster Davis Starkey, and Professor Alison Wolf. Tessa Jowell MP was predictably awful, George Galloway MP spoke some sense and some nonsense, and Matthew Hancock MP’s contribution was barely worth listening to, as he was toeing the Conservative party line so closely as to send viewers to sleep. The programme:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03twwfg/Question_Time_06_02_2014/

We’ll be putting up separate files of the two important discussions on our YouTube channel in the course of the next few days, but in the meantime the following should help guide you through the content:

ANONYMITY FOR MEN CHARGED WITH SEXUAL ASSAULTS (00:00 – 15:52)

An important piece in the wake of the recent scandalous show trials of two Coronation Street actors, one of them 81 years of age. Both men were cleared on all charges.

00:00 – 00:54 Introductions

1:15 – 3:29 George Galloway MP. A surprisingly good contribution to the debate.

3:30 – 5:24 Tessa Jowell MP predictably didn’t give a damn about men’s lives being ruined by false rape allegations.

5:25 – 7:33 Alison Wolf, Professor of Management, King’s College (London). A very impressive contribution to the debate.

7:34 – 10:54 David Starkey. An impressive contribution, followed by some nonsense from George Galloway.

10:55 – Matthew Hancock MP. The Coalition reneged on its agreement to re-introduce anonymity for people charged with sexual assault, and Hancock’s contribution to this debate was little short of embarrassing. It’s worth suffering his piece just to get to a little later material.

ALL-WOMEN PROSPECTIVE PARLIAMENTARY CANDIDATE (PPC) SHORTLISTS (46:24 – 57:18)

I spent more than a little time yesterday posting comments in response to a piece on ConservativeHome in which contributing editor Andrew Grimson was calling for the Conservative party to adopt all-women PPC shortlists. Pleasingly, almost all the comment stream consisted of hostile opposition. A link on a blog piece yesterday will take you to the article and the comments stream.

46:46 – 48:25 Tessa Jowell. More embarrassing drivel from Ms J. The Labour party plans to adopt all-women PPC shortlists for half the seats they deem ‘winnable’ in 2015.

48:26 – 51:10 Matthew Hancock. More embarrassing drivel including statements such as:

I’m a passionate supporter of having more women in parliament.

How many viewers realised the implications of the statement? He may as well have declared:

I’m a passionate supporter of having fewer men in parliament.

We suggest Hancock lead by example, and give up his seat for a woman in 2015. Nearly two years ago we presented him with a ‘Toady’ award:

http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/we-need-to-talk-about-the-rt-hon-matthew-hancock-mp/

51:11 – 53:14 Alison Wolf. Another very solid contribution.

53:15 – 54:45 George Galloway. He’s not a fan of all-women PPC shortlists given that all but two of the 101 ‘Blair Babes’ – new female Labour MPs elected in 1997 – voted for the Iraq wars. He wants shortlists to drive up the number of working class people in parliament.

54:46 – David Starkey. Another excellent contribution, followed by a comment by Tessa Jowell – about people invited to dine at 10, Downing Street – which was mind-numbingly stupid even by her standards.

If Tessa Jowell’s intelligence level could somehow be doubled, it would then be half Alison Wolf’s intelligence level.

David Starkey on quotas for female MPs

Our thanks to TC for pointing us to David Starkey’s short but excellent piece on a recent Question Time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnW3MacQ0G4

The full debate, with an excellent contribution by Professor Alison Wolf, is here:

https://j4mbdotorgdotuk.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/6-february-2014-question-time-discussions-on-anonymity-for-men-charged-with-sexual-assaults-and-all-women-prospective-parliamentary-candidate-shortlists/

Do we ‘need’ more female police officers?

We recently posted a link to an inspired video which addressed the intriguing question:

If we ‘need’ more women in boardrooms, do we ‘need’ more white Olympic 100 metres sprinters?

The video’s here:

https://j4mbdotorgdotuk.wordpress.com/2014/01/12/the-creator-of-manwomanmyth-returns/

Many years ago fitness tests for people wishing to join the police force were made less challenging. The following Daily Mail piece is undated, but refers to Oliver Letwin as the Shadow Home Secretary, which would place it somewhere in the period 2001-3:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-181623/Police-fitness-tests-downgraded-women.html

Letwin’s comment at the end of the piece:

I have to admit this leaves me at a loss. How can it be that the next generation of police officers won’t need to be as nimble as their present colleagues? Are we to imagine that criminals are going to oblige by becoming less fit as well?

From the article:

At present, while 95 per cent of men pass the tests, the success rate for women is just 51 per cent. Police chiefs believe it is proving a major deterrent as they attempt to increase the number of women officers.

Four out of seven unemployed people in the UK are men, and unemployment is known to be a bigger driver of suicide among men than among women. So why are police chiefs trying to increase the number of women officers? Back to the article:

Last night the move was backed by the leader of rank-and-file officers. Jan Berry, chairman of the Police Federation, said: “We welcome the decision to amend the tests. We want to ensure that many good potential officers of both sexes, who would otherwise be lost to the service, stand a fairer chance of becoming police officers without falling at the first hurdle.”

What do we know about the fitness levels of serving police officers, who’ve had to undergo compulsory fitness tests since last September? Only a minority of police officers are women, yet of the officers who’ve failed the fitness tests, two-thirds are women:

http://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/uk/hundreds-fail-police-fitness-tests-1-6434177