Our public challenges of David Willetts MP and Jeremy Hunt MP

We recently posted a piece on the Athena SWAN initiative, a largely taxpayer-funded initiative designed to advantage women and disadvantage men working as researchers in STEMM subjects (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Medicine):

https://j4mbdotorgdotuk.wordpress.com/2013/11/05/the-athena-swan-initiative-an-assault-on-male-scientists/

The ECU (Equality Challenge Unit) manages the Athena SWAN charter, and is largely funded by the departments led by two cabinet ministers, both of whom are Conservative MPs:

David Willetts – Minister of State for Universities and Science, based in the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

Jeremy Hunt – Secretary of State for Health, Department of Health.

We’ve just sent letters to both ministers, challenging them to end their departments’ funding of the ECU:

131116 letter sent to David Willetts final draft

131116 letter sent to Jeremy Hunt final draft

Peter Lloyd: ‘Circumcision is a universal horror. So why do some of London’s most powerful feminists refuse to save boys from genital mutilation?’

An important new piece by Peter Lloyd, please do what I’ve done, and sign the petition at the end of the article. It will take you only a few seconds. Thank you.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/mens-health/circumcision-is-a-universal-horror-so-why-do-some-of-londons-most-powerful-feminists-refuse-to-save-boys-from-genital-mutilation/

Ally Fogg’s new blog post, four days before International Men’s Day, 19 November

Earlier today Ally Fogg, a Guardian columnist, posted an interesting blog piece in advance of International Men’s Day, which is next Tuesday:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/hetpat/2013/11/15/can-you-make-me-shut-up-for-a-few-hours

I’ve just posted the following comment, and invite you to post your own comment.

Ally, thanks for this… There is of course a ‘chicken and egg’ situation here. One reason men often don’t seek help is that they’ve learned that when they do, there’s little or no support available – certainly true of the state, but often from families and friends too, including male family members and friends, it has to be said. On one of our blog pieces a (female) social worker reported that when a homeless woman contacts her on a Friday afternoon she’s required to supply her with what she requests of the following – accommodation, clothing, food, money. When a homeless man contacts her, she’s required to send him back onto the street with NOTHING. Homelessness is of course a major risk factor for suicide, 90% of homeless people are men, and British men are three times more likely than British women to commit suicide. It’s not too hard to join up the dots, is it?

Stuart Gulliver, Group Chief Executive of HSBC: sexist, racist, ageist

My thanks to J for pointing me to a piece (by a female journalist, needless to say) in the Guardian:

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/nov/08/hsbc-stuart-gulliver-women-in-banking

Stuart Gulliver, 54, Group Chief Executive of HSBC, calls his industry ‘male, pale and stale’, managing to fit into just four words sexism, racism, and ageism. The four women on his bank’s board – out of a total of 17 directors – are all non-executives. Does that alone not tell this man anything?

So, what is known about the impact of increasing women on banking boards? In our briefing paper on the impact of increasing female representation on boards http://c4mb.wordpress.com/improving-gender-diversity-on-boards-leads-to-a-decline-in-corporate-performance-the-evidence/ we have links to the reports from five longitudinal studies. All five studies showed that increasing female representation on boards leads to corporate financial decline. One should be of particular interest to Stuart Gulliver, maybe he could read the report when he’s next on his travels. It’s a study of German banks over a period of 16 years:

Executive board composition and bank risk taking (2012) (Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper, 03/2012)

Professor Allen N. Berger (University of South Carolina, Wharton Financial Institutions Center and Tilburg University), Thomas Kick (Deutsche Bundesbank), Professor Klaus Schaeck (Bangor University).

The researchers studied German banks over 1994-2010. The paper’s full Abstract:

Little is known about how socio-economic characteristics of executive teams affect corporate governance in banking. Exploiting a unique dataset, we show how age, gender, and education composition of executive teams affect risk taking of financial institutions. First, we establish that age, gender, and education jointly affect the variability of bank performance. Second, we use difference-in-difference estimations that focus exclusively on mandatory executive retirements and find that younger executive teams increase risk taking, as do board changes that result in a higher proportion of female executives [my emphasis]. In contrast, if board changes increase the representation of executives holding Ph.D. degrees, risk taking declines.

The Whine Club

I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain.

Lily Tomlin

This article is about some of the weapons shamelessly employed by women to manipulate and control men – shaming tactics, whining, and sexist behaviour and comments. Many women without mental health issues employ these weapons, but it’s become increasingly obvious that a disproportionate number of women who use them – and most, if not all, gender feminists – suffer from one or more mental health issues. These include personality disorders – most notably narcissistic personality disorder – borderline personality disorder, anger management issues, depression, anxiety disorders, and others. Many gender feminists are driven by poor experiences of men, often an individual man, possibly a father (often absent from the family, whether through their choice or not) or a partner. Damaged women are drawn to feminism like moths to a flame, and are inevitably damaged further. They really need to get treatment for their mental health problems, but they find it easier to spend their lives collaborating with other damaged women in attacking men and boys.

Laura Bates is the creator of The Everyday Sexism Project http://everdaysexism.com. At our political party Justice for Men & Boys https://j4mbdotorgdotuk.wordpress.com we always refer to it as The Everyday Whining Project. The following should give you a flavour of the tsunami of whiny submissions the site receives:

The Royal Mint will be giving away silver pennies in blue and pink pouches to those with babies born on the same day as Kate and William’s. Wonder who will get pink and who will get blue?

Purchased a new Hoover at the weekend. Pleasant enough experience at Curry’s, until I get to the tills. Male cashier asks if I need a hand getting it to the car, which I politely declined. He then advised me it was ‘really quite heavy’ (to which I quipped ‘well it’ll be me lugging it round the house’) and insisted I let him know if I do ‘decide I need a hand’. I appreciate it’s good customer service to ask the first time, but would you persist like this if I were male? I wouldn’t mind, but he looked weaker than I do, even with his penis.

So what was the hapless cashier to do? Presumably some customers – women in particular – initially decline the offer of help getting items to a car, but then change their minds when they realise how heavy or bulky an item is. If the man hadn’t made the second offer, and the woman had changed her mind (a woman’s prerogative, of course) it would surely – given her line of reasoning – have been reasonable for him to refuse to help. In which case she would presumably have made a different complaint on Laura Bates’s website.

The site’s content is translated into 18 languages. Laura Bates is clearly a full-time whine collector. The amount of exposure she gets in the British mainstream media is beyond belief. I once had the grim experience of debating with Laura Bates on a popular BBC radio programme, The Jeremy Vine Show. If you wish to get a sense of just how whiny she is, this should do the trick:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75Z4NRGkeVE

One of her many TV appearances, whining on International Women’s Day last year:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzV92m7p_dI

I believe girls learn at a young age that whining gets them what they want, especially from over-indulgent parents who might later wonder why their daughters became Entitlement Princesses. Inevitably these girls continue whining into adolescence and adulthood because they continue to get what they want. It’s up to men to break the cycle, and I’ll write an article about that subject one day. I make a few suggestions later in this article.

It’s been speculated that whining and shaming tactics developed at an early stage in human evolution, so that men worked harder to provide for women and children than they might otherwise have been inclined. Natural selection would have favoured men who were more sensitive to shaming and whining, because when they worked harder, society would have benefitted, more children would survive…

The hard-wired propensity of women to whine, and the hard-wired propensity of men to do whatever it takes to stop them whining, have become deeply dysfunctional in the modern world. Many women have insatiable appetites for more goods and services, special treatment, and attention, and their partners are doomed to failure in even attempting to satisfy those appetites. The state, too, is doomed to failure in seeking to satisfy them.

Earlier today we launched The Whine Club, a club exclusively for whiny women. Inspired by the Entitlement Princess of the Month award http://www.antifeministtech.info/entitlement-princess-of-the-month-submissions we’ll be asking for suggestions for Whiny Woman of the Month. So many obvious candidates to choose from. Laura Bates is, of course, the inaugural member of The Whine Club. Members will only be permitted to leave the club if they give us a written undertaking to stop whining.

There are, of course, numerous different varieties of whine, including:

Vintage whines – women are paid less than men when doing the same work, all men are rapists…

Classic whines – men objectify women, men discriminate against women in the workplace…

Corked whine – the regrettably short period of silence which follows a man deftly popping a cork into the mouth of a whining woman. Champagne corks are particularly effective

Red whine – one coming from a woman who’s so cross, her face is red

American whine – one coming from an American woman (likewise Italian whine, English whine…)

Then there’s ‘whine drinking’ or ‘whine tasting’, terms used to describe the experiences of countless men who let women whine despite having alternative options e.g. walking away, or listening to their MP3 players with the volume cranked up to whatever level it takes to drown out the whining. Men living in houses with cellars can put a sign on the cellar door, ‘The Whine Cellar’, and politely direct whining women towards it. In houses without a cellar, the smallest room in the house – or possibly the garden shed – could be designated ‘The Whine Box’.

Moving on from whining to sexism, our political party Justice for men & boys (and the women who love them) https://j4mbdotorgdotuk.wordpress.com recently launched The Alternative Sexism Project and I cordially invite you to contribute your own stories http://thealternativesexismproject.wordpress.com. You won’t need to leave either your real name or email address. We don’t want the site to have the whiny tone of The Everyday Sexism Project, we want to develop a resource showing that men and boys are disadvantaged – sometimes very severely – as a result of sexist behaviours and comments. We’re looking for personal stories from men (and women) about women (and men):

– shaming men and/or boys

– controlling men and/or boys

– disadvantaging men and/or boys

– advantaging women and/or girls

Obvious examples include the following, but there are countless others, both serious and low-level:

– Denial of access to children following relationship breakdowns, judges’ unwillingness to enforce contact orders

– Parental alienation of children

– Financial ruin as a consequence of divorce, even when the wife has contributed little or nothing to the couple’s joint wealth

– Police not believing male victims of domestic violence, taking the woman’s word for what happened

– Sexist narratives and statements in TV and radio programmes, in films, newspaper articles, websites and blogs…

– Sexist statements made by politicians, judges, civil servants…

– Lenient sentencing by the judicial system of women convicted of serious crimes e.g. making false rape accusations

– Economic disadvantaging e.g. on first dates, even in expensive restaurants, women will either not offer to pay a share of the cost, or will make a cursory effort to appear willing to do so, perhaps reaching for a purse when the bill arrives. When the man says, ‘Thanks, but I’ll take care of it’, no woman has ever been known to protest, lest he change his mind

– Lack of respect for men. On a crowded street even elderly men of a certain age are routinely expected to give way to women, including young women

– Women (and many men) preferencing women when recruiting and/or promoting staff

– Women being preferenced for social housing and social services

– When a woman has an unplanned pregnancy, she has the sole right to determine whether the foetus is aborted, the baby adopted, or the child raised at the man’s expense. The man has no rights and whatever responsibilities she chooses to give him

– Healthcare disadvantaging – programmes aimed at diagnosing female-specific cancers are far better funded than those for male-specific cancers

– Men suffering from the physical and/or mental consequences of male circumcision

– Educational disadvantaging – teachers (female and male) focusing more time and effort on boys than girls

– Teachers (female and male) punishing boys more harshly than girls after committing the same misdemeanours

– If her car breaks down, or a tyre is punctured, a woman can expect a man to stop and help her. Woman never stop to help men in the same situation

– Women shamelessly barging in front of men in queues, expecting service in bars when they’ve only just arrived, and you’ve been waiting for some time

– Women-only gym and swimming sessions

– In Labour and Lib Dem constituencies, women-only prospective parliamentary candidate shortlists

Thank you for your support.

E-Petitions: Block Passage of Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill

My thanks to the lady who’s just informed me of an important e-petition to be sent to the government. From the website:

Responsible department: Home Office

Organisations such as the Manifesto Club and the human rights group Liberty have expressed serious concerns regarding the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill. Provisions within the bill criminalise any behaviour which can potentially cause ‘nuisance or annoyance’ from the age of 10. It also grants local authorities, police and even private security firms sweeping powers to bar citizens from assembling lawfully in public spaces, which seriously curtails the rights to protest and freedom of assembly. Those who defy orders under the new rules will face arrest, fines and even prison time. This is a threat to human rights and effectively renders the United Kingdom a police state. It is absolutely essential that the bill is stopped unless it is amended to address current concerns.

A link to the e-petition:

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/53083

I’ve just signed it along with one about the same issue on ‘Change.org’ which is attracting a lot of signatures (link below). It’s already 90% of the way towards its target of 25,000 signatures. We urge you to sign both petitions, it takes little time or effort. Thanks.

http://www.change.org/petitions/uk-government-reject-the-anti-social-behaviour-crime-and-policing-bill

 

 

Why we’ll be contesting Conservative marginal seats in 2015

People are sometimes surprised that we’re going to contest marginal Conservative marginal seats in 2015, rather than marginal Labour seats. We explain that under David Cameron’s leadership the party has followed all of the preceding Labour governments’ agendas with enthusiasm, in some areas going even further (e.g. threatening to legislate gender quotas for major corporate boards).

If we’re asked the same question in future, we might just point people to a video (on the YouTube channel of ‘MrShadowfax42’) of a Tory MP, David TC Davies MP, speaking in the House of Commons. The narratives are always the same. All single mothers are saints. All absent fathers are feckless.

What planet do these damnable people live on? It’s the state which enables vindictive women to stop their children’s fathers from seeing them for long enough to alienate the children, and very few judges are prepared to enforce contact orders – and these absent fathers are feckless? Denial of access to children is a significant contributor to the persistently high male suicide rate. The video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNrJA0mpOdY

An insightful line-by-line commentary of the speech, from MrShadowfax42:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3jX-AiN7Rc

I recommend subscribing to his YouTube channel:

http://youtube/user/MrShadowfax42/videos

Good to see AVfM covering the story:

http://www.avoiceformen.com/updates/david-camerons-government-is-a-wretched-hive-of-scum-and-misandry/