My thanks to the person who posted on a MHR site this morning, a diagram showing ‘The Success Indicator’. The author of the diagram, MaryEllen Tribby, is apparently seeking to copyright it. As an illustration of the sense of superiority many women feel over men collectively, it’s truly world-class:

http://maryellentribby.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Infographic-Black-01.jpg

It’s a small step from women’s sense of gender superiority to the sense of entitlement so many women demonstrate with monotonous regularity, all too often pandered to by men, and particularly men in positions of power (David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Vince Cable, Sir Roger Carr, step forward).

It’s a small step from women’s sense of entitlement to the pursuit of female supremacy, feminism. And if anyone doesn’t grasp that feminism is the pursuit of female supremacy, I invite them to watch this 13-minute video by ManWomanMyth:

https://j4mbdotorgdotuk.wordpress.com/feminism-is-the-hate-driven-pursuit-of-female-supremacy/

 

 

There are few people who hold as low an opinion of David Cameron as I do, but the columnist Peter Hitchens is definitely one of them. From the last Sunday Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2384272/PETER-HITCHENS-Dont-blame-immigrants–arent-ones-wrecking-Britain.html

David Cameron’s relentless and enthusiastic pursuit of feminist agendas includes assaulting single-earner families, in a manner reminiscent of the Labour administrations of 1997-2010. He really must be Harriet Harman’s poster boy by now. My thanks to SB for pointing me to an outstanding piece by Melanie Phillips in a recent Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2384565/I-despair-Tory-Party-bribes-mothers-to-care-children.html?ico=home%5eeditors_choice

My thanks to SJ for the following:

http://www.vizfact.com/10-ways-feminism-has-destroyed-the-world/

Thanks to DN for pointing me to this fine piece on ‘Dalrock’. It shows that feminism contains the seeds of its own destruction (link below). Good.

http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/10/15/how-the-destruction-of-marriage-is-strangling-the-feminist-welfare-state/

My thanks to LG for pointing me to an insightful article from Psychology Today, written in 2009 (link below). The author starts with a reference to Professor Susan Pinker’s book, The Sexual Paradox. I often recommend it to people, along with Professor Louann Brizendine’s The Female Brain and Professor Baron-Cohen’s The Essential Difference. Enjoy:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200908/why-modern-feminism-is-illogical-unnecessary-and-evil

Some joke. A few inches to one side, and the man would have fallen the full 45 feet rather than 15 feet, and quite possibly have been killed as a result. Would it have been regarded as a ‘joke’ if a man had pushed his wife in such circumstances, and she’d fallen off the balcony, possibly leading to her death? I think not. The story:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/derren-browns-terror-theatre-plunge-073931415.html#yCgdDD8

Despite the fact that many women are becoming wealthier, and men less wealthy – often because of crippling divorce settlements, let’s not forget – one truth remains eternal. Money must flow from men to women, if necessary at the state’s behest, not from women to men.

Women are disinclined to financially support men, and where possible will pair with a man better off than they are – a phenomenon termed ‘associative mating’. So what happens when a woman has more money than her ex-partner (regardless of the reason why)? It’s all too predictable. I must alert The Everyday Whining Project to this iniquity. Women paying alimony to men… who ever heard of such a crazy thing?

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/fl-alimony-reform-women-20130731%2c0%2c2917015.story

My thanks to JF for pointing me to an excellent GWW video from 2011:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA

I’m a big fan of a book written by Swayne O’Pie, ‘The Feminists’ Nemesis’. In the UK it sells under the title Why Britain Hates Men: Exposing Feminism. It’s available outside the UK (and also in a Kindle edition) with the title Exposing Feminism: The Thirty Years’ War Against Men. The Amazon link to the book:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Why-Britain-Hates-Men-Exposing/dp/0956821901/ref=sr_tc_2_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1375630200&sr=1-2-ent

Every now and then I look on Amazon to see if the book has any new reviews, and so it was that I’ve just spotted two new 5-star reviews posted recently by women. The first was written by Caroline Reed:

“Excellent book exposing the less than altruistic motivations of Britain’s feminist movement. Very succinctly dispels 30 years of feminist dogma/conditioning.”

The second was written by Fiona Ventura:

“I admit that I purchased this book primarily for my husband because, for many years now, he has been lamenting the situation in this country concerning the way men are treated and portrayed, especially in the media. I never really thought too much about it (one doesn’t, really, does one ?) even though I respected his views and could see – to an extent – what he meant.

After having had three girls I had a son a few years ago and, as he has grown, I have started to see things differently. And so after my husband read this book (and I had to endure cries of “Yes !”, “At last !”, “It’s SO true !” and the like) I felt I owed it to him … and to my son … and to myself to read what all the fuss has been about.

Apparently I am “betraying my sex” by writing this review. This book is EXTRAORDINARY. The author has laid out – very clearly and in an easy-to-read format – EVERYTHING one could ever want to know about feminism. He uses quotes from a considerable number of other authors and academics and it is apparent that much work has gone into this publication.

Could I find myself disagreeing with what he writes ? Well, quite simply, no. I tried so very hard to remain objective and, although I imagined that my gender would interfere with this aim, I discovered that it made no difference whatsoever and I found it virtually impossible to argue – to any logical degree – with what I read, to any extent that could render the author’s points invalid. I truly don’t think it can be done.

And then, yesterday, (and what prompted me to write this review), I had a (lesbian) friend round to visit and she saw the book next to the bed. When I asked her if she wanted to borrow it she replied, “No, I would burn it.” Shocking. Upsetting and disappointing. On questioning her further she explained that she had not heard of the book, knew nothing about it and responded solely on the basis of what was written on the cover. (She hadn’t even read the more emotive back page.) And it was then that the author’s point really hit home – especially his chapter on lesbian feminism – and I realised that this is a book that NEEDED TO BE WRITTEN and, completely and utterly, NEEDS TO BE READ. In fact, and I know it could never happen (and I know that with even more certainty after reading how feminist teachings have infiltrated the very heart of our education system), this book should be required reading in every school in the country.

You see, I know now that my husband has been right all along. The pendulum has swung far too far in Britain (and elsewhere) and I despair for the future of my son (and my daughters also, but less so). Men are becoming weak, sterile and impotent and much of that is down to how the last thirty years of Ideological Feminism (and the author explains the difference between that and Equality Feminism – with which he has NO issue – very clearly) have eaten away at masculinity. We are slowly eroding what it means to be a (proper) man. “Gutta cavat lapidem, non vi sed saepe cadendo.”

And how hugely sad that is …

FV

FV

P.S.  Right, I KNOW that the ONLY people who will disagree with this review will be feminists and weak, brainwashed males both of which groups need to take very long, hard and honest looks inside their own souls.  You are directly and indirectly responsible for an awful lot of society’s ills.  You can insult me and click on ‘No’ as much as you want – it won’t change my views and it won’t ‘unpublish’ this book.”