General election: Sophie Walker, Women’s Equality party leader, will challenge ‘misogynist’ Philip Davies MP

Wonderful news. This will help raise public awareness of men’s issues, and starkly expose how idiotic the Women’s Equality Party is, along with its leader Sophie Walker, twice a winner of our Lying Feminist of the Month award, in common with Sandi Toxic, party spokeswoman. Extracts from the piece in The Guardian:

She is the leader of the Women’s Equality party (WEP), a new political force committed to furthering the cause of gender equality, but which has yet to make inroads electorally.

He is a Tory MP who tried to derail a bill to protect women against violence, and told a conference hosted by an anti-feminism party that “feminist zealots really do want women to have their cake and eat it”. [Details of our conference here.]…

Walker, a journalist who became the WEP’s inaugural leader in 2015 and has been at the forefront of its campaigns for equal representation and pay in working life, said: “Philip Davies basically is a sexist misogynist who puts his own ego ahead of his constituents. His anti-equality agenda in Westminster threatens the rights and freedoms not just of women but also people with disabilities, BAME (black, Asian, and minority ethnic) and LGBT+ communities. I think that Shipley deserves an MP who will prioritise representing them and the issues that are important to their constituency, rather than using parliament as a stage to play out attention-seeking performances.”

Davies said: “I have consistently asked Sophie Walker to quote just one thing I have ever said which has asked for a woman to be treated less favourably than a man, and she hasn’t been able to find even one quote from the 12 years I have spent in parliament.

“I would very much welcome Ms Walker parachuting herself into Shipley as a candidate with her extreme politically correct agenda of positive discrimination and quotas, and am very happy to let the good people of the Shipley constituency decide who they want to represent them.”

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

21 thoughts on “General election: Sophie Walker, Women’s Equality party leader, will challenge ‘misogynist’ Philip Davies MP

  1. If Philip Davies is as Sophie Walker says “a sexist misogynist”, is it possible to be a non-sexist misogynist? And if she thinks that the people of Shipley deserve an MP who will “prioritise representing them and the issues that are important to their constituency” why is she standing ?

    Like

    • Good questions. She has been reported as saying she’ll be representing “women everywhere”, which not only begs the question of local issues, but also why should the male voters of Shipley vote for the daft woman? That said, men in Birmingham Yardley voted for the gobby Jess Phillips, while men in Camberwell & Peckham have helped Harridan Harperson win thumping majorities for many years. Turkeys voting for Xmas, one and all.

      Like

      • I am afraid that some male voters will hate Mr Davies so much they will vote for Walker. Many will be anti-Tory because of benefit cuts and so forth.

        Mike, who is the senior male cabinet minister who said women should get special treatment?. I think we have a right to know.

        Like

      • Any chance you could invite Jacob Rees-Mogg to speak at the next international conference on men’s issues I think he is an mp who will stand up for men’s right needs a bit of a nudge in the direction.

        Like

      • That hasn’t been my experience. I encountered him in Parliament Square during an anti-MGM protest, gave him a leaflet, and later wrote asking for a meeting. He declined.

        Like

      • As far as men voting for the likes of Jess Phillips is concerned I really cannot imagine why . The fact that they do is terrifying . I can only think that they believe that they are occupying some moral high ground by so doing and I fear that in the end we are going to need the male equivalent of the suffragette terrorists before anything changes. It is not something I would like to see but if the treatment of Philip Davies is anything to go by it might come to that.

        Like

      • I think mainly they’re voting for the Party not man or woman. In many safe seats (and Labour actually has more of them) the old adage that people woud vote for a donkey if it was put up as Party candidate is true. I presume the Labour Party reserves its safest seats for the likes of Jess, hence Mr Harriet Harman’s sex change to get his seat.

        Like

  2. Note that la Walker wants every other candidate to stand aside so that she is the only alternative to Mr Davies – basically she wants another all woman shortlist, this time of just one. One can judge how dense the poor cow is from her thinking that with no other opposition she can overturn Mr Davies’ substantial majority. She’s banking on the patently absurd conviction that men will vote for her simply because PD is a Conservative.

    Defra should be informed of an outbreak of something deleterious to bovine health in Shipley.

    Like

  3. There is something rotten at the heart of the WEP.
    But fortunately they advertise that fact in their very name.

    For therein resides the unmissable logical conflict which lies at the core and prompts the obvious question --
    

    “‘Why would women want equality when they already have privilege and advantage”?
    Doesn’t make sense.
    Genuine and real equality would be a step backwards for them.

    So from this we know that that in naming their bodged up deceit vehicle as they have, they’ve already committed their first attempt at misleading any potential electorate before they’ve even really started.

    This shows profound contempt for, and underestimation of, those they CLAIM to represent.
    A defining characteristic of feminism in general as they seek to manipulate, mislead and cynically use people in general and women in particular.
    Being lied to (and from the very start too in this case) does not tend to play well with The People, of any ‘gender’.

    All 32 of them!

    This amounts to a famous ‘Ratner Moment’ par excellance, and will be highly instumental in the deline and fall of their facile and opportunistic conceit, which I respectfully suggest is a key understanding about them and their bloated hubris and misrepresentation.

    And anyway that niche has been taken by the established and familiar job creation scam known as the Fawcett Society already.

    Like

    • They have kept very quiet about the many privileges women already have, and are careful to omit anything that doesn’t support their cause. Such as the details of male victims of their female spouses. Too many men, especially male politicians, who are generally not idiots, have not pointed this out, either because they think it would not be politically correct to do so, or because they are scared of a feminist counter-attack.

      Like

    • Yes they already have privilege and advantage but the trouble is I think that they genuinely believe they are discriminated against. It seems to be something innate. Perhaps there is something Darwinian here to ensure that women get the best of what is going so they are more likely to survive. What is worse is that many men despite all the evidence seem to agree with them.

      Like

      • Yes I think you are right jb. (jb?) It is inate as envy is, in so many of our flawed but remarkable species.

        Right again in suggesting a link with evolution since everything we are and have today must have come down to us from the past – no rocket science there I admit!
        The evil genius of feMarxism is to have identified this faultline and successfully exploited it.
        The faultline original Economic Marxism sought to lever open was between ‘The Workers’ on the one hand, and ‘The Bloated Capitalists’ on the other.

        This failed in the West I believe because the line between the two was blurred and indistinct, unlike Russia, say, which was still in the grip of medieval peasant culture.
        An oversimplification I know, but go with it for now.

        However, there us another faultline available for those determined to seek power by any means possible.
        That is to say that very nearly everyone is either a man OR a woman.
        What if society could be split asunder along those lines?
        Cultural Marxism — “Come On Down….!”

        Like

  4. She’s a fine looking woman which is rare in the rad fem movement. I’m very curious about what led her to this tragic lifestyle choice. Was it something horrific in childhood, or just a case of being easily led at college.

    Those great genes all wasted when she could have been a happy wife and mother. It’s depressing.

    Like

  5. UKIP’s Paul Nuttall announced yesterday how UKIP want to fight oppression by banning the burqa and prosecuting FGM. No mention of MGM. Pathetic.

    Like

  6. Well of course a first question might be why a Women’s Equality Party when so many Party’s have women leaders . In Northern Ireland, Plaid Cymru, SNP and Scottish Labour not to mention 50% of the green Party Leader and the Conservative leader and Prime Minister. Now one of the Presidential Candidates of France! Surely Sophie is entirely redundant! I have to say I rather like it that yet again some of the most prominent women are not darlings of the left. No real idea of Marine Le Pen’s politics but one rather thinks feminists will be unsupportive if she became Pres.

    Like

Leave a comment