Plastic surgeons may face FGM charges for operating on women who reportedly paid privately for cosmetic ‘designer vaginas’

Wherever it is carried out, FGM is overwhelmingly carried out by women, at the behest of women. Staff across the feminist-riddled criminal justice system are surely aware of this reality, but for ideological reasons will not pursue the prime culprits, middle-aged and elderly black women, which would better protect girls from suffering the procedure.

Feminists are determined to pin the problem on men, so now the police / CPS plan to retrospectively criminalise cosmetic operations on women who’ve reportedly paid privately, treating the operations as FGM. We can be confident the targeted surgeons will be male.

Today The Times published a short piece on the matter. It ends:

Sinitta, the singer, recently said that she planned to have her own vaginoplasty broadcast online.

The patriarchs who ordered her to do this have yet to be identified.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • ‘My body, my choice’ unless a feminist decides otherwise, then it’s your body, but HER choice

  • “In the public interest”. So a set of laws largely useless for their stated purpose gets applied to situations far removed from FGM to the admittedly frequently daft “body modification” industry. So in fact it has been precisely useless in combating FGM of Girls.
    As you say because the societies involved are very sex segregated the two most likely offences are leaving the UK to have FGM, in which case a girl will be accompanied by female relatives not males. And having the “operation” done, which again will be done by women because its women’s business . As far as all the intelligence indicates the “operations” are almost always done in the originating countries. The whole thing is a monument to the contradictory nonsense of the day.
    So the only bit of the programme that makes any sense at all is the millions spend on NGOs spreading our disapproval to Africa. Not popular as this actually looks like white people talking down to africans ( short cirtcuit there on the “anti-colonialism/racism” multiculturalism circuits). It also has found the men aren’t particularly supportive a. because its womens business and they are kept out of it and b. being circumcised themselves don’t regard GM as uncommon (so the “patriarchs” are kept away and cant stop it and anyway get “cut” themselves so probably are bemused as to the big difference). As you say any actual prosecution in this country, most likely the travel offence, would be a woman because no man would be allowed to travel thus with a girl (feminist short circuit there).
    So we are left funding feminist “missionary” missions to tell jonny foreigner what to do and political (sorry public interest) show trials of cosmetic surgeons indulging westerners whims for re modelled bodies. Doesn’t add up to much. Particularly as all public services have been trained at huge cost right across the country (rather than the easily identified places where these communities live).
    Might of been better to simply say all GM of minors is wrong and worked on that.

    • Thanks Nigel. The original FGM Act was in 1985, the 2003 Act made illegal the taking of girls abroad for the purpose of having the procedure performed there.

  • Can’t stand it anymore, I’m going to bed laughing.

  • William Gruff

    Expect even more failed politically motivated prosecutions of innocent men using corrupt interpretations of law and consequent demands from feminists for ‘tougher’ legislation while refusing to see the real causes of the problem, a problem that, in instances such as this, does not exist.

  • If the CPS are saying a consented to medical procedure to a adult woman’s genital area is now always illegal then it will have two consequences. Many pregnant women and/or their children will have to die due to complications during natural child birth that would normally include cutting to resolve, and you cannot have any trans gender operations. So much for diversity and so much for care of women and children. Only feminist logic can cause this.