A gormless feminist journalist’s article on HuffPo UK, following today’s International Men’s Day debate in the House of Commons

Along with a number of J4MB supporters I was in the public gallery of the main chamber of the House of Commons this afternoon, to hear Philip Davies’s debate on International Men’s Day. Philip was on fine form, as always. Pleasingly, J4MB and ICMI16 were mentioned a number of times by feminist MPs, in a desperate and utterly futile attempt to discredit Philip. I’ll be saying more about the debate in the next day or two. In the meantime, for sheer entertainment value, I offer you a silly piece by Martha Gill, Political Reporter for HuffPo UK. They obviously can’t get the staff…

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • bakamonosan

    “And don’t speak too soon For the wheel’s still in spin
    And there’s no tellin’ who that it’s namin’
    For the loser now will be later to win
    For the times they are a-changin’’

    Something is happening, but the writer of the HuffPo article doesn’t know what it is.

  • An archive or the article for anyone not wanting to give them traffic: https://archive.fo/PM12R

    • Good call. At this point, I think HuffPo gets more clicks from MRA’s than Feminists. I have a HuffPo poll screen shot that adds evidence for this.

  • epistemol

    The best they can do at this stage is to attempt a rearguard action,
    since they know they’ve been rumbled and their happy days of seemingly unending easy victories are over.

    It’s tempting to draw an analogy with Britain itself in, say, about 1943 when we were slowly getting stronger, whilst the Jerries had over extended themselves and passed their zenith, particularly in Russia.

    However,
    “Now this is not the end….”

  • I remember that in the 90s I noticed that feminist writers would highlight such minor “inequalities” as are mentioned in the article (I don’t know if they’re true or not) but were silent on those affecting men. Today things have changed. Feminists now actively oppose the redress of inequalities affecting men. There is no common ground. “Gender equality” doesn’t come into it. This is all about “US, and to hell with men.” So sad.