Killing the ‘sisterhood’: why identity politics didn’t work for Clinton

Our thanks to Martin for this piece in the New York Post.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • epistemol

    A quote from this article;

    “When women were genuinely oppressed — before they could “, etc. etc.

    Thus I see this author still subscribes to the false re-written history about women’s one time ‘oppression’ though…

  • Hard to believe that a feminist could possibly describe a stay at home mother, fully supported by a working husband, as oppressed. Only a deranged mind could think of something like that.
    Regarding the article, great to see that the voters (enough of them anyways) recognized the lack of substance in Hillary’s campaign and would not vote for her when her main message was electing the first female president, regardless of vision or sound public policy proposals.