William Collins: The Law is a Joke

Outstanding. William Collins’s blog pieces remain the gold standard in the manosphere, in my view, and in the view of many to whom I spoke at the recent conference.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • epistemol

    I cannot even begin to make a comprehensive comment on this impressive work by William Collins (which should, by rights, be taught in all schools and universities).
    But I can offer the briefest summing up of the situation by saying that the effect of such ‘laws’ and police proceedures is to deliver the femarxist holy grail of guilt ‘estsblished’ by mere accusation only with no evidence required, or even allowed, and of preventing even the possibilty of any defence, in effect making conviction obligatory and automatic.
    This has been done before of course – they were known as ‘show trials’.

    • In a sense “show trials” are common. With new laws ,law firms deliberately seek out cases that could set a “precedent” because to do so successfully gets you into the legal books. The CPS does this too, a good example being the one FGM case thus far prosecuted which the judge was critical of having had to judge. These cases tend to be in the areas which are likely to get one (lawyer) noticed. Hence the absence of interest in paternity fraud or MGM. Though not a n expert I get the impression that the Judiciary are more frequently censuring the CPS for cases they bring which are “in the public interest2 but actually very weak.

  • Congratulations on the Conference by the way. I sincerely hope you have the moment that Nigel Farrage had. “You’re not laughing now”.

  • Just one point. Until the passing into Statute of the coercive control law there wasn’t an actual crime of domestic abuse or violence. The recording by police was and is administrative in that they record crimes and decide which included a “domestic” circumstance. But now the feminists version of Domestic Abuse is expressed in the Law and so by finding out the number of prosecutions (and convictions) one can now find a much more realistic record of abuse. I suspect an FOI will find quite a small number. There don’t to be estimates any more.