Male Genital Mutilation – Richard Duncker (Men Do Complain) on The Jeremy Vine Show

Our thanks to Kevin for loading this onto our YouTube channel.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Good it is being debated. I must say I felt hatred towards the ignorance of the two pro circumcision men. The death toll and extreme emotional and sexual unhappiness that many men and boys suffer is of no consequence to these pro circumcision men. And even worse the pro woman.
    This fucks up men’s lives. We are not dictating our stand on this.
    We can meet this issue half way and a male can decide to remove the end of his penis when he is old enough to make a considered decision about it. While knowing the consequences.
    It is them, the pro circumcision who are dictating. The Jewish man said something along the lines about, his son can make his decision whether he decides to be a practicing Jewish man in his faith. Thats true. But he can’t be naturally intact again can he? Grow the end of his penis back again as he was. This is historic and cultural misandry. The disregard a man as an all rounded human being, with value for just being whole and natural. Doing something wrong for a long time doesn’t make it right. We know its wrong to interfere with girls and woman. Mitts off creeps!

  • It is depressing to hear another father justify MGM as if it was just a bit of skin. Jeremy Vine’s lack of knowledge was also evident. This is not an arbitrary human rights issue, it is plain and simple child abuse. The Father thinks his penis works ok and his wife is happy because they have a child. Since he does not have a foreskin I am confident that he cannot know the difference.

    Some American women do know the difference.

    “I’ve done a fair amount of research (FOR SCIENCE!) with about equal ratio of cut to uncut men. My results conclude that uncut men are better in the sack,” says Sarah, 36.

    “My first run in with an uncircumcised penis made me realize I never wanted to jerk off a circumcised one again,” says Patricia, 35.

    “Never been intimate with one, but have heard from MANY friends that dudes with their foreskin still in tact are better in bed, because they feel EVERYTHING 10 times as much! I don’t know if there’s any scientific basis in that though. It might be only three times as much,” says Bets, 30.

    Marsha Goudreau (name disguised), a Michigan woman whose late husband of more than 20 years was uncircumcised, who later experienced sex with circumcised men, said she now knows her husband’s foreskin was a blessing for both of them.

    “The nice thing that happens is that the gliding back and forth stimulates the head of the penis without irritating it,” she said. “The shaft moves in and out of that glove, which pleasures the woman without painful friction. And if you’re not having intercourse for some reason, the foreskin makes a hand job a lot easier.”

    In technical terms: “Mucosal surfaces of the glans and foreskin move back and forth across the mucosal surfaces of the labia and vagina, providing nontraumantic sexual stimulation for both male and female.”

    • William Gruff

      I consider the female sexual experience to be utterly irrelevant where the disgusting and insupportable practice of male genital mutilation is concerned.