Judges say they will ignore pre-nups unless couple are rich: Warning that majority of agreements are a waste of time and courts will instead base decisions on ‘fairness’

Our thanks to Jeff for this. The ‘fairness’ on which decisions will be based will invariably favour wives over husbands, whether or not the couples have children, and whether or not wives have made a material contribution to the couples’ financial assets.

Men who might be tempted to marry should at least visit our associated website, Men Shouldn’t Marry.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • pavetack

    Here’s the irony – “whether or not wives have made a material contribution to the couples’ financial assets”. She stayed home or worked part time? Then she needs alimony (and child support) because her future earnings are less! She had a job that paid as much or more than the husband? Then those assets are half or more hers! Give her more support to even things out!

  • I believe in many European countries the marital assets are only those built up during the marriage. Hence the UK is divorce central for Eurpean gold diggers wealthy